Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:
And I forgot an important part: Both DHCP servers should be "not
authoritative;" - well at least the LTSP one should be or you will run into
trouble.
I think I get it. Kind of round robin the servers.
I was checking some notes on the configuration of my ipcop bo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 14:14 schrieb Anselm Martin Hoffmeister:
> Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 14:04 schrieb Tom Allison:
> > Otherwise I think I'm left with a strategy of:
> > Configure it manually
> > Make a back up on the ipcop box.
> > Do
Tom,
Seems like a great question for the ipcop folks.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Tom Allison wrote:
> I have run into a little problem with the DHCP configuration for IPCOP
> (version 3)
>
> Out of convenience and simplicity I am currently using ipcop's installation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 14:04 schrieb Tom Allison:
> I have run into a little problem with the DHCP configuration for IPCOP
> (version 3)
>
> Out of convenience and simplicity I am currently using ipcop's
> installation of DHCP to manage the few
I have run into a little problem with the DHCP configuration for IPCOP
(version 3)
Out of convenience and simplicity I am currently using ipcop's
installation of DHCP to manage the few dynamic addresses on my network.
I typically have Static IP's because the handful of computers I have
on the
Following reading an email from Greene, Jason A [ITS]I have copied an entry from my
DHCP server relating to DHCP and LTSP on separate machines, while also using PXE boot.
I had a few problems sorting this out as the PXE client expects pxelinux.0, and the
LTSP kernel to be TFTP'd from the DHCP se
