On 29/08/2007, Sherwood Botsford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Munch...
Hello Jim,
Thank you so much for the direction.
I've followed it and now am able to partition the network using dhcp as you
stated.
However I'm stuck on the next-server parameter. You see, I put
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Munch...
Hello Jim,
Thank you so much for the direction.
I've followed it and now am able to partition the network using dhcp as you
stated.
However I'm stuck on the next-server parameter. You see, I put the dhcp
server
on a different server other than the LTSP
Try taking the next-server directive out of the top subnet portion and try just
leaving
the call out in the LTSP 5 section to see if that helps. I have not ran an
ltsp network
in this fashion so I don't know for sure how this should look.
Jim
However I'm stuck on the next-server parameter.
On Saturday 25 August 2007 03:00:24 Jim Kronebusch wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:11:28 +0700, Fajar Priyanto wrote
Hello all,
I took this part of dhcpd.conf from Jim Kronebusch yesterday :)
I have a situation where the LTSP5 clients is located in the same network
as the non-LTSP clients.
Hello all,
I took this part of dhcpd.conf from Jim Kronebusch yesterday :)
I have a situation where the LTSP5 clients is located in the same network as
the non-LTSP clients. Therefore I believe we can use the host declaration
based on MAC address.
But, I'm sure about the correct syntax. I need
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:11:28 +0700, Fajar Priyanto wrote
Hello all,
I took this part of dhcpd.conf from Jim Kronebusch yesterday :)
I have a situation where the LTSP5 clients is located in the same network as
the non-LTSP clients. Therefore I believe we can use the host declaration
based on
