Bob;
Thanks for the tip - this seems to be the best option my equipment.
No mouse droppings and something I didn't expect: It's 18% faster
with "NoAccel" than with "Accel" and 23 % faster than "VESA".
I did some crude measurements using "x11perf" to get these
results.
I don't know how to explain
Bob;
Thanks for the tip - this seems to be the best option my equipment.
No mouse droppings and something I didn't expect: It's 18% faster
with "NoAccel" than with "Accel" and 23 % faster than "VESA".
I did some crude measurements using "x11perf" to get these
results.
I don't know how to explain
Tom, try this in the lts.conf:
XSERVER= nsc
X_DEVICE_OPTION_01 = NoAccel
bob
On 12/15/05, Tom Griffing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cristi;
>
> Thanks for the tip.
> I put the entries in the lts.conf file and verified that it generated the
> correct entries in the XF86Config-4 fil
Cristi;
Thanks for the tip.
I put the entries in the lts.conf file and verified that it generated the
correct entries in the XF86Config-4 file, but the "mouse droppings"
persisted.
It finally went away when I enabled the shadow framebuffer:
Option "ShadowFB"
Thanks for pointing me in the r
On 12/8/05, Tom Griffing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello;
>
> I am using a new thin client with the following specs:
>
> *Processor and System Chipset:*
>
> · AMD GX2-466 333Mhz processor
>
> · Front side bus 33/66 Mhz
>
> · AMD CS5535 chipset
[..]
try the SWCursor and HWCursor
Hello;
I am using a new thin client with the following specs:
*Processor and System Chipset:*
· AMD GX2-466 333Mhz processor
· Front side bus 33/66 Mhz
· AMD CS5535 chipset
*Memory:*
· 128MB DDR266 RAM
*Graphic:*
· Optimized shared memory architecture
