[Ltsp-discuss] IceWM + File Manager for Desktop Icons

2002-01-24 Thread Charles Marcus
Thanks Michael and Dario, This is exactly what I was looking for. I don't care too much if it is a little hevier on the network - it can't be as heavy as running a full KDE (or GNOME) desktop environment. Any chance one (or both) of you could elaborate a bit on what exactly is entailed in ge

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] IceWM + File Manager for Desktop Icons

2002-01-24 Thread mslicker
Those programs require GNOME. If you run them through straight ICEwm, you will also be running GNOME. However, it will be faster because you will have configured it yourself and thus will not have put all those billions of other things into it like the major distrobutions do. That's why it's f

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] IceWM + File Manager for Desktop Icons

2002-01-24 Thread Dario Rapisardi
Hi Charles, In my case (Debian Woody with GDM as Display Manager) I have the following commands in /etc/gdm/Sessions/Icewm: dfm & exec /usr/bin/X11/icewm And that's it. DFM will be up and running the next time you start-up IceWM. You can replace the 'dfm &' line with 'nautilus &

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] IceWM + File Manager for Desktop Icons

2002-01-24 Thread Michael H. Collins
Enough FUD. gmc does not require gnome. And Caldera is the most proprietary Distro there is. Their RPMS do not work on other distros and Mostly vice-versa too. If Caldera was so good more Real Penguinistas would use it. mslicker wrote: > Those programs require GNOME. If you run them throug

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] IceWM + File Manager for Desktop Icons

2002-01-25 Thread Michael H. Collins
You did not address your blatent lie about gmc. This makes anything else you might have to say very questionable. You obviosly have never tried Conectiva. mslicker wrote: > Yes, > > This is the last email I will send on this topic. > > You are correct that Caldera has earned a reputation

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] IceWM + File Manager for Desktop Icons

2002-02-04 Thread mslicker
Michael, There is a difference between a mistake and a lie. I read to quickly and presumed that "gmc" was the login utility for GNOME--gdm. People will sometimes make little mistakes, it's rediculous to suggest that such things make them liers or untrustable.. After all, the entire thread here