mslicker wrote:
> It is very important to correct misleading presumptions made by authors of
> articles in the media. If the context is given that its two approaches
> for an administrator, versus a comparison of two technologies that are
> apples and oranges (in the broader context), then this a
I suppose I am just protective of KDE about misleading and inaccurate
statements. From a systems administrator's point of view, yes--if you
don't want to change to Caldera, it would be more practical to just use
ICEwm over the default configuration of RH, SuSE, or Mandrake's KDE or
GNOME.
Howev
Sorry. It was:
Totally agree Jason.
Chao.
Offray Vladimir.
On dom, 2002-01-27 at 13:33, OFFRAY LUNA wrote:
> Totally agree Matthew.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Offray Vladimir
>
>
> On vie, 2002-01-25 at 05:56, Jason Bechtel wrote:
> > Matthew,
> >
> > From a scientific viewpoint it naturally makes
Totally agree Matthew.
Cheers,
Offray Vladimir
On vie, 2002-01-25 at 05:56, Jason Bechtel wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> From a scientific viewpoint it naturally makes more sense to compare
> the actual "window manager" portions of each system. But why would any
> system administrator responsible
Matthew,
From a scientific viewpoint it naturally makes more sense to compare
the actual "window manager" portions of each system. But why would any
system administrator responsible for dozens, perhaps hundreds, of
corporate Linux desktops take the time to customize KDE so that it runs
fast
OK,
I have other priorities at the moment, but I might just do that. In
the mean time, take Caldera's new desktop beta as the fix.
--Matthew
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Michael H. Collins wrote:
> Well... Fix it and put it in contribs.
>
>
> mslicker wrote:
>
> > Well then if you can com
Well... Fix it and put it in contribs.
mslicker wrote:
> Well then if you can compare Windows Managers (WMs) to desktop systems
>
> What I'm saying is, you are blaming the wrong thing for you desktop's
slow
> performance. I gaurantee it.
>
> --Matthew
>
--
Michael H. Collins
Well then if you can compare Windows Managers (WMs) to desktop systems
then why not compare KDEwm to ICEwm?
Let me tell you something, without the underlying desktop componant
architecture (and applications that use it), you will use vastly more
system resources as you add simultaneous users a
Check out ROX-Filer. Takes up very little ram and has desktop icons.
Arthur H. Johnson II
The Linux Box
http://www.linuxbox.nu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Michael H. Collins wrote:
> Don't know what it does for performance, but gmc allows icons. I have
> set it up to come on with
