Thks Alkis and Vagrant for yours answers... Still a little bit work for me ;-)
Yes, Vagrant, my script is harsh and dirty... I'll work on it ;-)
2015-02-08 14:45 GMT+01:00 Nicolas LEBRUN nlebrun...@gmail.com:
Thks Alkis and Vagrant for yours answers...
Still a little bit work for me ;-)
Hello,
NBD is 5 times faster, NFS is more stable on disconnects (where you also
lose SSHFS connections, processes etc though).
Btw it's possible to run squashfs over NFS (exporting only a single file
over NFS, i386.img) for stability + 90% of the NBD speed.
Is it 5x faster at boot-time or
On 2015-01-31, Nicolas LEBRUN wrote:
I'm trying to build a ltsp-server as versatile as possible (old kernel
or not, fat or not...) because clients can be very different... We
have actually about 20 servers on Wheezy with NFS chroots with no fat.
...
And i have many questions
- NBD seems to
On 2015-01-31, Nicolas LEBRUN wrote:
- NBD seems to be really stable. The only advantage of NFS seems to
be able to modify chroot in real time... What do you think ?
NBD is 5 times faster, NFS is more stable on disconnects (where you also
lose SSHFS connections, processes etc though).
Btw
Hi,
I'm trying to build a ltsp-server as versatile as possible (old kernel
or not, fat or not...) because clients can be very different... We
have actually about 20 servers on Wheezy with NFS chroots with no fat.
At the moment, i install everything in a Jessie virtualbox... with the
script
