Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Moving from LTSP 4.2 to LTSP 5 package

2007-11-02 Thread asmo . koskinen
> Can anyone give me some insight into what things will be affected? To me problem was thin client itself. LTSP5 indeed needs more power out of thin client. I have used Jammin 225 as my daily work horse on Ubuntu 6.06/LTSP 4.2-system. It didn't work anymore with LTSP 5 (no X, no LDM). But HP t513

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Moving from LTSP 4.2 to LTSP 5 package

2007-11-02 Thread Scott Balneaves
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:33:57AM -0400, Kevin Squire wrote: > > Now that LTSP 5 is nicely packaged with Debian, and with local apps > looking promising on LTSP 5, I was thinking about making the move. But > I am a bit worried. > > I have been using LTSP since 3.something. I am currently using

[Ltsp-discuss] Moving from LTSP 4.2 to LTSP 5 package

2007-11-02 Thread Kevin Squire
Now that LTSP 5 is nicely packaged with Debian, and with local apps looking promising on LTSP 5, I was thinking about making the move. But I am a bit worried. I have been using LTSP since 3.something. I am currently using LTSP 4.2 All this time it has been a not-distro app. I am worried that r