Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RAM requirements

2009-12-17 Thread Dan Young
2009/12/17 Frédéric Grelot : > it works at the kernel, and I think it isn't limited to kvm. However, I'm not > an expert with it, and it may be confirmed by someone else. > It anyone has a F12 under its hand with KSM enabled, look at > /proc/kernel/vm/ksm/page_shared (or something like this), if

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RAM requirements

2009-12-17 Thread Xavier Brochard
I've found some documentation. KSM is very interesting: while it was made for virtualized guest at first, it can be used for every process. The CERN use it already for the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Here's some papers on KSM: From Linux Weekly News: http://lwn.net/Articles/330589/ In french,

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RAM requirements

2009-12-17 Thread Frédéric Grelot
it works at the kernel, and I think it isn't limited to kvm. However, I'm not an expert with it, and it may be confirmed by someone else. It anyone has a F12 under its hand with KSM enabled, look at /proc/kernel/vm/ksm/page_shared (or something like this), if it is non-zero, and you don't have a

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RAM requirements

2009-12-17 Thread Xavier Brochard
Le jeudi 17 décembre 2009 09:47:11, Frédéric Grelot a écrit : > I may also add that if you run KSM (Kernel Same page Merging) on the server > side, it may dramatically improve your RAM consumption, since all clients > use the same programs, and thus could share many pages. However, i know > that

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RAM requirements

2009-12-17 Thread Frédéric Grelot
I may also add that if you run KSM (Kernel Same page Merging) on the server side, it may dramatically improve your RAM consumption, since all clients use the same programs, and thus could share many pages. However, i know that ksm runs fine on fedora (12), but I'm not sure if it has been ported

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RAM requirements

2009-12-16 Thread Scott Balneaves
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:44:45AM -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: > Scott Balneaves wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:33:39PM +, Evan Ingram wrote: > >> hi > >> > >> i've seen various numbers quoted for ram requirements on an ltsp server; > >> "ranging from 256Mb + 32Mb per client to 1024Mb

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RAM requirements

2009-12-16 Thread Stéphane Graber
Scott Balneaves wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:33:39PM +, Evan Ingram wrote: >> hi >> >> i've seen various numbers quoted for ram requirements on an ltsp server; >> "ranging from 256Mb + 32Mb per client to 1024Mb + 64Mb per client." >> >> what are peoples findings in the real world? i need

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] RAM requirements

2009-12-16 Thread Scott Balneaves
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:33:39PM +, Evan Ingram wrote: > hi > > i've seen various numbers quoted for ram requirements on an ltsp server; > "ranging from 256Mb + 32Mb per client to 1024Mb + 64Mb per client." > > what are peoples findings in the real world? i need to spec up a server > for a

[Ltsp-discuss] RAM requirements

2009-12-16 Thread Evan Ingram
hi i've seen various numbers quoted for ram requirements on an ltsp server; "ranging from 256Mb + 32Mb per client to 1024Mb + 64Mb per client." what are peoples findings in the real world? i need to spec up a server for a school implementation of about 64 workstations, so needs to perform usual w