On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:45:34 +0100, Richard June <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then I completely misunderstood the purpose of Xdamage. I thought it would
> transmit only the parts of the page which had changed, no matter the reason.
If this where the case - for video - most pixels will change from
On Sunday 24 September 2006 17:11, Ben Green wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:21:34 +0100, Richard June <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Xdamage should help immensely, but I don't know of any distro
> > which enables it by default.
>
> I really don't think Xdamage will help at all. This extension is
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:21:34 +0100, Richard June <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Xdamage should help immensely, but I don't know of any distro
> which enables it by default.
I really don't think Xdamage will help at all. This extension is for
efficiently handling damage done to drawing objects by o
[snip]
> So skype, mythtv, sound in browsers just work? They don't. So this is the
> reason for my thoughts ...
I need to chime in here. ESD isn't the greatest solution, however it's
has
been the most effective way I've found so far. I have had audio in browsers
working pretty well *, th
I am not sure I have the context entirely, but would
like to add the following:
Trying to "remote" the audio from ltsp server to
client works only in some cases. I tried in vain for a
few days to get Skype and kphone working. I used
esddsp as the "shim" to do the job. It is extremely
frustrating.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:19:52AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Congratulations. You just described exactly what esd and the esd shim
> > basically does.
>
> So skype, mythtv, sound in browsers just work? They don't. So this is the
> reason for my thoughts ...
That's right, they don't.
I just read http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/Ltsp5
So maybe I'll just sit and wait.
The reason for RFC was exactly this:
On Saturday 23 September 2006 05:59,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The objection to LTSP clients is sound (from my users)
> > There are solutions, but they are pretty yu
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:44:35AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
> The objection to LTSP clients is sound (from my users)
> There are solutions, but they are pretty yuk eg has anybody got skype to work
> on a thin client?
>
> So ...
> based on a request for midi on thin clients ...
>
> A
Hi
The objection to LTSP clients is sound (from my users)
There are solutions, but they are pretty yuk eg has anybody got skype to work
on a thin client?
So ...
based on a request for midi on thin clients ...
A (small) client daemon that accepts a tcp connection from the server
A server program
