Jim-
Thanks, I'll take a look at this then.
Evan
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:56:12 -0500 (EST), Jim McQuillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Evan,
>
> the LBE is only available via CVS.
> And, one of the major reasons for the LBE is to allow people to build
> local apps to run on the client. It's st
Evan,
the LBE is only available via CVS.
And, one of the major reasons for the LBE is to allow people to build
local apps to run on the client. It's still not *easy*, but we're
working on it.
Jim.
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Evan Hisey wrote:
> Jim-
> Where is the current LBE for 4.1? or is it only
Jim-
Where is the current LBE for 4.1? or is it only available via CVS?
Does teh LBE provide help in building packages for local apps for use
with the local_apps option?
Evan
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:33:50 -0400 (EDT), Jim McQuillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon,
>
> The kernel is now bui
Simon,
The kernel is now built in the LBE (Ltsp Build Environment).
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Simon Langley wrote:
> Is there one?
>
> I am trying to get a laptop with a wireless PCMCIA card working as an X
> terminal with absolutely no success so far. The old LTSP
Is there one?
I am trying to get a laptop with a wireless PCMCIA card working as an X
terminal with absolutely no success so far. The old LTSP wireless
package doesn't work on my laptops and since there isn't an up-to-date
wireless package, I thought I would try making my own.
Unfortunately for
