Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Which solution is better?

2002-07-13 Thread Francis Avila
> things get this bad). Network bottlenecks are especially troublesome: even > with a switched 100BaseT network, the pipe from server to switch is only > 100Mbps. However, this pipe must serve every single client. If you have 50 > clients sharing a 100Mbps pipe, you're going to have bottlenecks

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Which solution is better?

2002-07-12 Thread Derek Dresser
Quoting Francis Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > From: "Chris Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I was wondering; is it better to have 2 LTSP servers handle a lab of 30 > > terminals or is it better to have 1 LTSP box and one App server handle 30 > > terminals? I ask this because I've heard some people

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Which solution is better?

2002-07-12 Thread Francis Avila
From: "Chris Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I was wondering; is it better to have 2 LTSP servers handle a lab of 30 > terminals or is it better to have 1 LTSP box and one App server handle 30 > terminals? I ask this because I've heard some people have multiple LTSP > boxes and I have also heard peo

[Ltsp-discuss] Which solution is better?

2002-07-12 Thread Chris Thomas
I was wondering; is it better to have 2 LTSP servers handle a lab of 30 terminals or is it better to have 1 LTSP box and one App server handle 30 terminals? I ask this because I've heard some people have multiple LTSP boxes and I have also heard people have only one LTSP box and multiple app serv