On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Jeff Siddall wrote:
> On 04/07/2011 11:21 AM, Gideon Romm wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> You have 2 empty sections there. Sections cannot be empty -> you need
>> at least one uncommented param=value line.
I have commented out entirely the group sections that had no option
On 04/07/2011 11:21 AM, Gideon Romm wrote:
> David,
>
> You have 2 empty sections there. Sections cannot be empty -> you need
> at least one uncommented param=value line.
Yup, I found that restriction the hard way also. I don't see any good
reason for it so it is probably a bug.
Jeff
David,
You have 2 empty sections there. Sections cannot be empty -> you need
at least one uncommented param=value line.
-Gadi
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:14 AM, David Burgess wrote:
> I added some MAC entries to my lts.conf yesterday and rearranged the
> ordering of sections slightly. Today I no
The [dunvegan] section is empty as the only line in it is commented out.
It could be a parser problem, finding a section name right after another
one with no content in between?
Le 07/04/2011 17:21, David Burgess a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:14 AM, David Burgess wrote:
>> I added some MA
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:14 AM, David Burgess wrote:
> I added some MAC entries to my lts.conf yesterday and rearranged the
> ordering of sections slightly. Today I noticed that my clients weren't
> setting their hostname according to the HOSTNAME variable, which is
> something that was working un
I added some MAC entries to my lts.conf yesterday and rearranged the
ordering of sections slightly. Today I noticed that my clients weren't
setting their hostname according to the HOSTNAME variable, which is
something that was working until yesterday. So I did some
investigating:
~# cat /var/log/
