Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-24 Thread Gudmund Areskoug
Hi Verner, Verner Kjærsgaard wrote: Hi list, - I apologize for this strange posting, it's partly a test to see if my mail works at all. I'm stranded in a hotel room with only Windows internet access. thanks for reminding me of an old todo-wishlist item of mine: making a road warrior LTSP

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-24 Thread Richard Bos
Verner, Op donderdag 23 november 2006 23:32, schreef Verner Kjærsgaard: No, that is not entirely correct. It's enough if only the hostname is the very same, a FQDN is not needed. please state so in the wiki. That a lot of people will enjoy your correction. It will be the same with your

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-24 Thread Scott Balneaves
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 08:19:42PM +0100, Richard Bos wrote: Verner, Op donderdag 23 november 2006 23:32, schreef Verner Kjærsgaard: No, that is not entirely correct. It's enough if only the hostname is the very same, a FQDN is not needed. please state so in the wiki. That a lot of

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-23 Thread sokol
Patrick Barber a écrit : Scott Balneaves wrote: On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:14:31PM +0100, sokol wrote: Nope sir, 32 bit is not a unique solution. We have here biOpteron x86_64 server and in similar situation we compiled fuse and ltspfs on this server and it works like a

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-23 Thread Verner Kjærsgaard
sokol skrev: Patrick Barber a écrit : Scott Balneaves wrote: On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:14:31PM +0100, sokol wrote: Nope sir, 32 bit is not a unique solution. We have here biOpteron x86_64 server and in similar situation we compiled fuse and ltspfs on this

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-23 Thread Roland Holder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Verner! I'd be glad to see your solution descibed on the ltsp wiki. I'm moderating a german ltsp forum and a lot of questions about problems with 64 bit SuSE came there in the last few weeks. Thanks, Roland Verner Kjærsgaard schrieb: sokol

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-23 Thread Richard Bos
Verner, Op donderdag 23 november 2006 23:12, schreef Verner Kjærsgaard: I then realized that my fuse installation was severely broken. So, I downloaded fuse 2.6 from sourceforge.net in source code. Compiled it with no swithes or anything directly on my SuSE10/64bit. can you test the server

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-23 Thread Verner Kjærsgaard
Roland Holder skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Verner! I'd be glad to see your solution descibed on the ltsp wiki. I'm moderating a german ltsp forum and a lot of questions about problems with 64 bit SuSE came there in the last few weeks. Thanks, Roland Verner

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-23 Thread Verner Kjærsgaard
Richard Bos skrev: Verner, Op donderdag 23 november 2006 23:12, schreef Verner Kjærsgaard: I then realized that my fuse installation was severely broken. So, I downloaded fuse 2.6 from sourceforge.net in source code. Compiled it with no swithes or anything directly on my SuSE10/64bit.

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-23 Thread Kamchybek Jusupov
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:12:41 +0100 / Verner Kjærsgaard wrote: With a subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues The SuSE10 runs on a dual 64bit machine, i.e. it's a 64 bit version. That's where the catch is. I had a similar situation with 64-bit Ubuntu installation. A test with ldd ltspfs

[Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-22 Thread Patrick Barber
I have a small problem with localdev running on a OpenSuSE 10.1 64Bit server: when i insert a USB device the icon appears on the desktop but the data that i know is on the device is not readable/visible after following the 'checklist' on the wiki, here are my results Step 2: cat

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-22 Thread Scott Balneaves
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 06:55:54PM +, Patrick Barber wrote: I have a small problem with localdev running on a OpenSuSE 10.1 64Bit server: We've run into this before. The ltspfs binary is 32 bit, and linked against 32 bit libs. You'll need to install the 32 bit fuse libs. Scott -- Scott

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-22 Thread Patrick Barber
Scott Balneaves wrote: On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 06:55:54PM +, Patrick Barber wrote: I have a small problem with localdev running on a OpenSuSE 10.1 64Bit server: We've run into this before. The ltspfs binary is 32 bit, and linked against 32 bit libs. You'll need to install the

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-22 Thread sokol
Scott Balneaves a écrit : On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 06:55:54PM +, Patrick Barber wrote: I have a small problem with localdev running on a OpenSuSE 10.1 64Bit server: We've run into this before. The ltspfs binary is 32 bit, and linked against 32 bit libs. You'll need to install

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-22 Thread Joseph Toman
Scott Balneaves wrote: On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 06:55:54PM +, Patrick Barber wrote: I have a small problem with localdev running on a OpenSuSE 10.1 64Bit server: We've run into this before. The ltspfs binary is 32 bit, and linked against 32 bit libs. You'll need to install the 32 bit

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-22 Thread Scott Balneaves
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:14:31PM +0100, sokol wrote: Nope sir, 32 bit is not a unique solution. We have here biOpteron x86_64 server and in similar situation we compiled fuse and ltspfs on this server and it works like a charm. Well, yes, if you compile LtspFS for 64 bit, then it should

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] localdev issues

2006-11-22 Thread Patrick Barber
Scott Balneaves wrote: On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:14:31PM +0100, sokol wrote: Nope sir, 32 bit is not a unique solution. We have here biOpteron x86_64 server and in similar situation we compiled fuse and ltspfs on this server and it works like a charm. Well, yes, if you compile