Bastian Dingeldein wrote:
> > > what about the shared memory?
I like mosix very much. it's cool and easy to use,
but I think it can't share memory between the nodes (yet)
so it is good for tasks with high CPU-Load
like compiling big C/C++ projects, image/movie rendering , sound & video
encodi
It just works? It is usfull and fun too. My SetiatHome stats are
really getting a boost from my mosix cluster.
Bastian Dingeldein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have an idea and want to know if it is possible.
> in my network many systems are normal computers running win2k on
> harddisk or act as an lt
John Cuzzola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp server smp memory experience?
> cluster?
>
>
>
> *** I've tried the Mosix package ... It works and it was fairly eas
ltsp server smp memory experience?
cluster?
*** I've tried the Mosix package ... It works and it was fairly easy to
set up.
On 10 Dec 2001, Bastian Dingeldein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have an idea and want to know if it is possible.
> in my network many systems are normal comp
*** I've tried the Mosix package ... It works and it was fairly easy to
set up.
On 10 Dec 2001, Bastian Dingeldein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have an idea and want to know if it is possible.
> in my network many systems are normal computers running win2k on
> harddisk or act as an ltsp client via f
Hi,
i have an idea and want to know if it is possible.
in my network many systems are normal computers running win2k on
harddisk or act as an ltsp client via floppy.
these systems are pentium two/three and celeron between 350 and 700mhz.
i think thats hardware overkill. what about to use these pe
