Martin,
Thanks. RH9 is one of my development/test machines, and it has worked
fine here. I'll take another look at it, and see what's going on.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 5 May 2004, sysadmin wrote:
> Having had great success with LTSP3, we decided on the rollout
> of the new s
sysadmin wrote:
Having had great success with LTSP3, we decided on the rollout
of the new servers (RH9 kernel 2.4.20-8) to change to LTSP4.
It all works swimmingly, once I overcame a problem with
the ltspcfg script. Running option 7 (XDMCP configuration)
insists that gdm is our display manager, e
Having had great success with LTSP3, we decided on the rollout
of the new servers (RH9 kernel 2.4.20-8) to change to LTSP4.
It all works swimmingly, once I overcame a problem with
the ltspcfg script. Running option 7 (XDMCP configuration)
insists that gdm is our display manager, even though we are
