On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Also, NFS is fairly resilient to handling some types of disconnects- it will
> just block filesystem access until the connection becomes available again. So
> that might be a short-term way to explore resolving your issues. It is slower
>
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:58:44AM -0600, David Burgess wrote:
> Please correct me if I'm wrong: both thin and fat clients load a basic
> Linux OS from the tftp server. From there, thin clients normally
> connect to a remote desktop, while fat clients continue to load the
> whole OS, desktop and al
You address a problem that I had been considering for a long time
regarding thin client disconnects.
I haven't been using LTSP for a few months, but as I recall, the thin
clients are actually very resilient to disconnects. I ran an
experiment where I unplugged Ethernet at the client for 2 minutes,
We have roughly 100 diskless thin clients here running LTSP, all for
RDP. This morning I had a thought, so I'm hoping some discussion here
might help to enlighten us on where this might lead me.
Please correct me if I'm wrong: both thin and fat clients load a basic
Linux OS from the tftp server. F
