Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-30 Thread Berend De Schouwer
On Thursday 30 January 2003 05:16, John Karns wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Berend De Schouwer said: > > On Friday 24 January 2003 16:57, Alexander Perry wrote: > > > I personally would modify Tom's response and say that 10bT NICs are > > > fine for 386/486 class computers because you'll never run

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-30 Thread John Karns
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Berend De Schouwer said: > On Friday 24 January 2003 16:57, Alexander Perry wrote: > > I personally would modify Tom's response and say that 10bT NICs are fine > > for 386/486 class computers because you'll never run the high color and > > high bandwidth applications that woul

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-25 Thread wouter . debacker
ary 22, 2003 10:39 PM > To: LTSP discussion list > Subject: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation > > > Hi Peter, > > According to my experience a 386, when used as a terminal, has the > following problematic areas: > > 1) It only has slow ISA slots and AFAIK 100 Mb

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-24 Thread Berend De Schouwer
On Friday 24 January 2003 16:57, Alexander Perry wrote: > I personally would modify Tom's response and say that 10bT NICs are fine > for 386/486 class computers because you'll never run the high color and > high bandwidth applications that would overwhelm the port on a faster PC. > Since you're now

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-24 Thread Alexander Perry
I personally would modify Tom's response and say that 10bT NICs are fine for 386/486 class computers because you'll never run the high color and high bandwidth applications that would overwhelm the port on a faster PC. Since you're now needing to protect that 10bT bandwidth and not waste any, you h

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-24 Thread Angel Gabriel
bject: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 06:40, Angel E. Gabriel wrote: > How would this help.. > > " 1) It only has slow ISA slots and AFAIK 100 Mb ISA NICs are hard to > find. If you're using hubs then try replacing them with switches " W

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-24 Thread Tom Schouteden
ross all ports. A switch on the contrary will have the full 100Mb per port. tom > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:39 PM > To: LTSP discussion list > Subject:

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-23 Thread Angel E. Gabriel
day, January 22, 2003 10:39 PM To: LTSP discussion list Subject: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation Hi Peter, According to my experience a 386, when used as a terminal, has the following problematic areas: 1) It only has slow ISA slots and AFAIK 100 Mb ISA NICs are hard to find. If you're

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-23 Thread wouter . debacker
Some of my terminals are equiped with an S3 Trio64 card, some have a Trident 8900/9000 and still others contain a Matrox Millennium G200. The specific brand and type don't really matter as long as the card is of the PCI type, can carry enough video RAM and is well supported by XFree86. On 22-Jan-

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-22 Thread pedro noticioso
I got a dozen 200 Mhz compaq computers with a sys chipset and exactly those 2 PIC ports, one has the famouse Realtek 8139 NIC, what is your choice of video card? I might get it for my new terminals 8) --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Jan, > > My bottom line is drawn at a 486DX2, 66MHz, 16 Mb >

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-22 Thread wouter . debacker
Hi Jan, My bottom line is drawn at a 486DX2, 66MHz, 16 Mb RAM and at least two PCI slots. One for a 100 Mbit NIC connected to a switch, the other for a decent graphics card with at least 2 Mb video RAM. In my experience many companies, which replace their PCs every two years, gladly give most of t

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-22 Thread wouter . debacker
Hi Peter, According to my experience a 386, when used as a terminal, has the following problematic areas: 1) It only has slow ISA slots and AFAIK 100 Mb ISA NICs are hard to find. If you're using hubs then try replacing them with switches. 2) Usually its graphics card contains 512 Kb of slow RAM

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-22 Thread Jake Schroeder
I agree that a P90/32MB is significantly faster than a 386-40/8MB. Once it boots, is it usable? Typically, people won't shut the computer off once it is up and running. - Jake On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 06:24:59AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I want to run a 386/40 MHZ with 8 MB of

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-22 Thread Berend De Schouwer
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 13:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I want to run a 386/40 MHZ with 8 MB of RAM as workstation, connected via > 10BaseT to the server. The trouble is that the whole boot process is during > some 4 minutes. The download of the kernel works fine, "uncompressing > Li

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] 386 as workstation

2003-01-22 Thread Jan Wilson
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030122 05:52]: > I want to run a 386/40 MHZ with 8 MB of RAM as workstation, connected via > 10BaseT to the server. The trouble is that the whole boot process is during > some 4 minutes. The download of the kernel works fine, "uncompressing > Linux" is some