IceWM does seem like a nice desktop, and configuration is relatively
straightforward.
Thanks for the tip,
Gerry
> Or, you can look at qvwm.
>
> Still I prefer IceWM.
>
> Jim McQuillan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Gerry
--
IT Specialist | "Do not repay anyone evil for evil. If your enemy
MCC
the thing is that most users are so familiar with Windows. So
far from their feedbacks they think KDE is as close as to Windows and
they like it..But KDE use lots of resourcesGuess we have to deal
with it..
We have to educate them that Windows is not everything...:)
Jim McQui
Or, you can look at qvwm.
Still I prefer IceWM.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John F Cuzzola wrote:
>*** I would have to agree. My first attempt was with gnome then kde - both
>look pretty but the amount of resources they used on the server was
>enormous. Not to mention it was difficult to
;<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> On 9/19/01, 10:22:22 AM, John F Cuzzola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> regarding RE: [Ltsp-discuss] Yet another question about which X environment
> to use:
>
>
> > *** I would have to agree. My first attempt was w
;>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> On 9/19/01, 10:22:22 AM, John F Cuzzola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't like XFCE... darn
Try QVWM or icewm.
just like Winders.
Gerry Kirk wrote:
> We're planning to move to an LTSP environment this fall. Next month, we'll
> set up a training / test lab as a trial run.
>
> Has anyone put together a comparison of Gnome vs. KDE vs. XFCE and any other
> X env
If you REALLY want slim, check this out:
http://www.menuetos.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 9/19/01, 10:22:22 AM, John F Cuzzola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
My choice is xfce. It is really fast and very easy to configure. In my
opinion kde is too slow. another advantage is the cde like style. every user
can configure his easy to use envirement.
mfg bastian
___
sorry about my english, i am not a native speaker.
- Original Message -
*** I would have to agree. My first attempt was with gnome then kde - both
look pretty but the amount of resources they used on the server was
enormous. Not to mention it was difficult to lock dowm. Ultimately I went
with ICE. It has a few quirks and is not as "pretty" but it looks good,
extremel
A lot of it depends on the environment its going to be used in. give ICEwm a
look if you haven't already. I have looked at XFCE but I assume they are
similar. KDE and GNOME are going to be the better looking more Windows
feeling of any WM you find if you looking for a truly slim WM I don't think
t
10 matches
Mail list logo
