-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Finally merged! :)
Thanks
David
On 12-01-30 04:58 PM, Thibault, Daniel wrote:
>> For some reason, this patch does not apply ...
>
>Okay, my git repository is now properly connected, and below is the patch
> rewritten for the current commit. Be
> For some reason, this patch does not apply ...
Okay, my git repository is now properly connected, and below is the patch
rewritten for the current commit. Besides enforcing the return values and
outputting --help to stdout, the problem lay with the instances of struct
ctx_type *type being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Those are already upstream ;)
David
On 12-01-30 04:39 PM, Thibault, Daniel wrote:
> -Message d'origine-
> Envoyé : 30 janvier 2012 16:18
>
>> For some reason, this patch does not apply ...
>>
>> Applying: lttng-tools add_context.c : Fixing m
-Message d'origine-
Envoyé : 30 janvier 2012 16:18
> For some reason, this patch does not apply ...
>
> Applying: lttng-tools add_context.c : Fixing memory leaks
> error: patch failed: src/bin/lttng/commands/add_context.c:520
> error: src/bin/lttng/commands/add_context.c: patch does not ap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Merged thanks!
We did indeed validate the function and it's seems ok and test passes.
If you are changing good portion of code, you can run "make check" to start the
tests and you'll see if you break something. It's not very complete tests but
it's a
This fifth patch rewrites lttng-ctl's set_session_daemon_path() to avoid
duplicating snippets of code. It also fixes the snprintf return value test so
the code works with both GNU C < 2.1 and >= 2.1. With GNU C < 2.1, snprintf
returns -1 if the target buffer is too small; with GNU C >= 2.1,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Merged thanks!
David
On 12-01-27 02:33 PM, Thibault, Daniel wrote:
> bin/lttng/commands/create.c : Completing the return values overhaul, setting
> --help usage() to stdout
> bin/lttng/conf.c:
> * In config_read_session_name(), moved the malloc to t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
For some reason, this patch does not apply ...
Applying: lttng-tools add_context.c : Fixing memory leaks
error: patch failed: src/bin/lttng/commands/add_context.c:520
error: src/bin/lttng/commands/add_context.c: patch does not apply
In the meant
-Message d'origine-
Envoyé : 30 janvier 2012 15:27
> You can pull over HTTP, for example:
>
> git clone http://git.lttng.org//lttng-tools.git
>
> This usually gets through corporate firewalls.
One problem solved, I guess. My problem was that I only tried the git: path
(git://git.lttn
This fourth patch simplifies create_session() in create.c
--
>From e81d91e548bc9dc94dc9e89ff0bf1150f43ebbda Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:03:10 -0500
From: Daniel U. Thibault
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:02:53 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] lttng-tools : create.c : Simplify create_sessi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Merged thanks!
David
On 12-01-30 03:27 PM, Thibault, Daniel wrote:
>As promised, here is the first of a new set of patches, starting from the
> 2012-01-30 18:27 commit (2.0-pre18+-5c73c59).
>
>This first patch fixes miscellaneous little thi
This third patch documents (and in one instance, enforces) return values for
functions of lttng-ctl, calibrate and create.
It also fixes the test of getgroups(), which cannot return (grp_id < -1).
--
>From 6739ca025c89937cd4e37c933715532fdc39ced0 Mon, 30 Jan 201
This second patch fixes a memory leak in lttng-consumerd.c, various strings
and comments, directs usage to stdout for --help, and enforces the return
values of cmd_add_context().
--
>From 39726bfddd9dc1cd8931eb1bbddc54b78c2d16e3 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:22:28 -0500
From
On 12-01-30 01:52 PM, Thibault, Daniel wrote:
> -Message d'origine-
> De : David Goulet [mailto:david.gou...@polymtl.ca]
> Envoyé : 30 janvier 2012 13:12
>
>
>Now, out here we have a separate problem getting at the git repositories
> using the git: protocol. The port isn't open in ou
As promised, here is the first of a new set of patches, starting from the
2012-01-30 18:27 commit (2.0-pre18+-5c73c59).
This first patch fixes miscellaneous little things wrong with strings and
comments.
--
>From cb6916eb52786f8caf1612c576500ca6bb6f4e76 Mon, 30
-Message d'origine-
De : David Goulet [mailto:david.gou...@polymtl.ca]
Envoyé : 30 janvier 2012 13:12
> I'm having problem applying those patches. It fails at the third one and I
> think
> it's because you change lttng-ctl.c in the second patch and the third one is
> not
> based on thos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
H,
I'm having problem applying those patches. It fails at the third one and I think
it's because you change lttng-ctl.c in the second patch and the third one is not
based on those changes.
Can you please send me three separate emails for those pa
On 2012-01-30 08:35, Miceli, Carlo J. wrote:
> Will this release work with LTTV-GUI program ?
>
> Does it support GUI viewing?
We hope to have a version of LTTV working for this release.
We are still early in its development, so it would be very experimental.
We should have a better estimate by the
Will this release work with LTTV-GUI program ?
Does it support GUI viewing?
Thanks,
Carlo
-Original Message-
From: lttng-dev-boun...@lists.lttng.org
[mailto:lttng-dev-boun...@lists.lttng.org] On Behalf Of Mathieu
Desnoyers
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 8:12 AM
To: Tony Jones; Greg KH
C
Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that the current target for LTTng 2.0
final release is mid-February, so we are aiming for feature freeze (rc1)
in a matter of 2-3 days.
Please let us know if things work fine in your environment.
Best regards,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Eff
20 matches
Mail list logo
