Re: [lttng-dev] lttng-modules compatibility for 3.12 kernels

2013-10-28 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
- Original Message - > From: "Otavio Salvador" > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" > Cc: "Philippe Mangaud" , "Daiane Angolini" > , "Fabio Estevam" > > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 10:05:23 PM > Subject: Re: lttng-modules compatibility for 3.12 kernels > > Hello Mathieu, > > On Sat, Oct 26,

Re: [lttng-dev] [PATCH] Add output module which write to an LTTng-UST tracepoint

2013-10-28 Thread Thibault, Daniel
-Message d'origine- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:45:33 -0400 > This module will call a LTTng-UST tracepoint with each syslog entry. > When LTTng is activated, this will write the entries in a CTF > (Common Trace Format) file. This allow the correlating of other trace > sources (kernel traces,

Re: [lttng-dev] [rsyslog] [PATCH] Add output module which write to an LTTng-UST tracepoint

2013-10-28 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Thanks a lot, will see that I can merge asap. In order to be useful, there would need to be at least some minimal doc (so that users at least know this module exists). Would you mind adding a basic doc page for the module? You could use e.g. ./doc/omsnmp as an example. Thanks, Rainer On Thu, Oct

Re: [lttng-dev] lttng-modules compatibility for 3.12 kernels

2013-10-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Mathieu, On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Thanks for the patches ! You're welcome. > I merged patch 0001 as is (lttng-statedump-impl: Fix lttng_list_interrupts > for empty implementation) into lttng-modules master, stable-2.3, stable-2.2. Great. > For patch

[lttng-dev] lttng-modules build failure for 3.12-rc6

2013-10-28 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, Part of build issues are now fixed in master (thanks Mathieu for applying the need changes) but we're still not good: CC [M] /home/otavio/hacking/fsl-community-bsp/build-mx23evk/tmp/work/imx23evk-poky-linux-gnueabi/lttng-modules/2.3.2+gitAUTOINC+4f1217f8ce-r0/git/probes/lttng-probe-kme

Re: [lttng-dev] CTF: trying to understand "missing fields"

2013-10-28 Thread Vlad
On Oct 21, 2013, at 6:53 PM, Vlad wrote: > Greetings, > > The CTF spec contains a couple of mentions of how one could define a > missing field bitmask: > > "The header is extended in the rare occasions where the information cannot be > represented in the ranges available in the standard

[lttng-dev] The problem with compiling multiple tracepoint sources with app directly

2013-10-28 Thread zhenyu.ren
Hi,dev-list    It seems work well if there is only one tracepoint file(sample_tracepoint.h) including in app .i.esample_tracepoint.h#undef TRACEPOINT_PROVIDER #define TRACEPOINT_PROVIDER sample #if !defined(SAMPLE_TRACEPOINT_H) || defined(TRACEPOINT_HEADER_MULTI_READ) #define SAMPLE_TRACEPOINT_H