- Original Message -
> From: "Otavio Salvador"
> To: "Mathieu Desnoyers"
> Cc: "Philippe Mangaud" , "Daiane Angolini"
> , "Fabio Estevam"
>
> Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2013 10:05:23 PM
> Subject: Re: lttng-modules compatibility for 3.12 kernels
>
> Hello Mathieu,
>
> On Sat, Oct 26,
-Message d'origine-
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:45:33 -0400
> This module will call a LTTng-UST tracepoint with each syslog entry.
> When LTTng is activated, this will write the entries in a CTF
> (Common Trace Format) file. This allow the correlating of other trace
> sources (kernel traces,
Thanks a lot, will see that I can merge asap. In order to be useful, there
would need to be at least some minimal doc (so that users at least know
this module exists). Would you mind adding a basic doc page for the module?
You could use e.g. ./doc/omsnmp as an example.
Thanks,
Rainer
On Thu, Oct
Hello Mathieu,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
> Thanks for the patches !
You're welcome.
> I merged patch 0001 as is (lttng-statedump-impl: Fix lttng_list_interrupts
> for empty implementation) into lttng-modules master, stable-2.3, stable-2.2.
Great.
> For patch
Hello,
Part of build issues are now fixed in master (thanks Mathieu for
applying the need changes) but we're still not good:
CC [M]
/home/otavio/hacking/fsl-community-bsp/build-mx23evk/tmp/work/imx23evk-poky-linux-gnueabi/lttng-modules/2.3.2+gitAUTOINC+4f1217f8ce-r0/git/probes/lttng-probe-kme
On Oct 21, 2013, at 6:53 PM, Vlad wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The CTF spec contains a couple of mentions of how one could define a
> missing field bitmask:
>
> "The header is extended in the rare occasions where the information cannot be
> represented in the ranges available in the standard
Hi,dev-list
It seems work well if there is only one tracepoint file(sample_tracepoint.h)
including in app .i.esample_tracepoint.h#undef TRACEPOINT_PROVIDER
#define TRACEPOINT_PROVIDER sample
#if !defined(SAMPLE_TRACEPOINT_H) || defined(TRACEPOINT_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
#define SAMPLE_TRACEPOINT_H