Hi,
I have been thinking a little bit about if there is some way to both
define/implement and call tracepoints in a single call.
Normally, defining tracepoints goes something along these lines:
1. Define tracepoint in tp.h
TRACE_EVENT(..)
2. Generate probes in tp.c
define
The new script 'lttng-tcsh_completion' is provided to allow
command-completion for the tcsh shell.
The approach taken by this script is to to re-use the advanced bash
completion script and use its result for tcsh completion. This is
achieved by running the bash script and outputting the
- Original Message -
Hello,
Can you share with us the code of your hello probe ?
I used the example code from
http://lttng.org/docs/#doc-instrumenting-linux-kernel-itself .
Which version or git commit of lttng-modules are you
using ?
I used the current master of the github
Hello,
Can you share with us the code of your hello probe ?
I used the example code from
http://lttng.org/docs/#doc-instrumenting-linux-kernel-itself .
Which version or git commit of lttng-modules are you
using ?
I used the current master of the github mirrors, specifically:
lttng-tools:
On 24 April 2015 at 10:14, Marc Khouzam marc.khou...@gmail.com wrote:
The new script 'lttng-tcsh_completion' is provided to allow
command-completion for the tcsh shell.
The approach taken by this script is to to re-use the advanced bash
completion script and use its result for tcsh
On 23 April 2015 at 18:33, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
It should be fixed now, can you confirm ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
After a quick test, it's certainly better than it was.
Thanks!
Simon
___
lttng-dev mailing list
Seems to work for me too, no kernel panic and tests are running fine!
Thanks a lot!
Sebastien.
On 04/24/15 12:03, Simon Marchi wrote:
On 23 April 2015 at 18:33, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
It should be fixed now, can you confirm ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
After a quick
* Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
Hi Jon,
It appears that lttng-modules cannot build on the
Debian kernel 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt9-2 (2015-04-13)
x86_64 GNU/Linux.
It appears that their exported kmem.h header differs from
the upstream stable
Hi Mathieu,
Thank you for the patch: it works like a charm with 0.8.6!
From: Mathieu Desnoyers [mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 21:10
To: Eugene Ivanov
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org; Mathieu Desnoyers; Paul E. McKenney; Lai
- Original Message -
* Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
Hi Jon,
It appears that lttng-modules cannot build on the
Debian kernel 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt9-2 (2015-04-13)
x86_64 GNU/Linux.
It appears that their exported kmem.h header
* Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
- Original Message -
* Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
Hi Jon,
It appears that lttng-modules cannot build on the
Debian kernel 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt9-2 (2015-04-13)
x86_64
11 matches
Mail list logo