On 2019-05-07 4:40 p.m., Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> bitfield.h uses the left shift operator with a left operand which
> may be negative. The C99 standard states that shifting a negative
> value is undefined.
Please add a reference to the original problem that prompted you to
do this change in the
Hello,
I was just wondering what the default values for the sub-buffer size and
the number of sub-buffers are. I attempted to print them out after setting
the channel with default attr, however both values appear 0.
Thanks for any insight,
Mosleh
___
bitfield.h uses the left shift operator with a left operand which
may be negative. The C99 standard states that shifting a negative
value is undefined.
We also need to cast the result explicitly into the left hand
side type to deal with:
warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned
bitfield.h uses the left shift operator with a left operand which
may be negative. The C99 standard states that shifting a negative
value is undefined.
We also need to cast the result explicitly into the left hand
side type to deal with:
warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned
bitfield.h uses the left shift operator with a left operand which
may be negative. The C99 standard states that shifting a negative
value is undefined.
We also need to cast the result explicitly into the left hand
side type to deal with:
warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned
All merged in master and stable-2.11.
I made some minor changes to the messages of the unit tests.
"Fix: lttng_poll_mod calls compat_(e)poll_add" was backported to
stable-2.10.
Thanks!
Jérémie
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 06:23:26PM -0400, Yannick Lamarre wrote:
> From v5, fixed compilation problem
