Re: [lttng-dev] Large number of stream files in CTF trace -- too many file handles

2020-03-16 Thread Rocky Dunlap via lttng-dev
Jonathan, Increasing the soft FD limit worked great, both for the command line and the Python script. Thanks for the help! Rocky On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 8:51 AM Jonathan Rajotte-Julien < jonathan.rajotte-jul...@efficios.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > If this is not the right approach, how should I

Re: [lttng-dev] [PATCH lttng-modules] Add UDP and ICMP packet header information to the tracepoint:

2020-03-16 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
Hi Florian, Sorry, I could not apply this patch due to line-wrapping performed by your email client. Please use git send-email. Thanks, Mathieu - On Mar 13, 2020, at 7:32 AM, lttng-dev lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org wrote: > * UDP transport header > * ICMP transport header > > (Correct

Re: [lttng-dev] Large number of stream files in CTF trace -- too many file handles

2020-03-16 Thread Jonathan Rajotte-Julien via lttng-dev
Hi, > If this is not the right approach, how should I proceed? E.g., should the > source-ctf-fs manage a limited pool of file handles? I would think this > would be pretty inefficient as you would need to constantly open/close > files--expensive. I would probably start looking at the soft and