- On Feb 8, 2021, at 1:04 PM, lttng-dev lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org wrote:
> Dear LTTng developers,
> I was wondering if LTTng currently (or in the future) supports network
> namespaces. For instance, an ambiguity in the logs would make problems for
> future system analysis.
Did you try the
Dear LTTng developers,
I was wondering if LTTng currently (or in the future) supports network
namespaces. For instance, an ambiguity in the logs would make problems for
future system analysis.
Taking the "bind" system call, that would help us distinguish between
different local IP addresses when
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 5:27 AM RADERMACHER Ansgar via lttng-dev
wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> having thought a bit more about it, I can see now that nested types are
> problematic in general: some types in the language need to be mapped to types
> that match but are not identical, i.e. have likely a
Dear all,
having thought a bit more about it, I can see now that nested types are
problematic in general: some types in the language need to be mapped to types
that match but are not identical, i.e. have likely a different memory layout.
This would be problematic for nested types.
Thus, I'm
