Hi,
I am learning U-RCU now.
And I read paper Concurrent Updates with RCU: Search Tree as an Example
( https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/73e4/cd29273cf9d98d35bc184330e694ba798987.pdf
)
In this paper, the authors present a variant RCU implementation, and
argued their new RCU has better performance
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 04:05:45PM -0400, Yuxin Ren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am learning U-RCU now.
> And I read paper Concurrent Updates with RCU: Search Tree as an Example
> (
> https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/73e4/cd29273cf9d98d35bc184330e694ba798987.pdf
> )
>
> In this paper, the authors present
Hi Paul,
Thank you for your reply.
If I understand your reply correctly, the update-side lock you
mentioned is the lock used in the tree deletion algorithm.
But their urcu_synchronize contains no lock.
So I think the lock is kind of problem caused by their usage of RCU,
not from their urcu_synchr
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 02:41:23PM -0400, Yuxin Ren wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> If I understand your reply correctly, the update-side lock you
> mentioned is the lock used in the tree deletion algorithm.
Yes.
> But their urcu_synchronize contains no lock.
> So I think th
