Wow, thanks a bunch. Its 1 AM, and I had too much homework to try to fix
this today, but I'll see if I can work on it tomorrow or later this week. I
hope I can remember my block size.
-Eric Hattemer
- Original Message -
From: "Warren Togami" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
Below is the reply from Gregory Leblanc, maintainer of the Linux RAID HOWTO and
active in a few other important projects.
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 23:09, Warren Togami wrote:
Holy crap... my friend is in some severe trouble with his linux software
RAID. Any ideas about what he can do?
Sur
It probably wont stop a worm from spreading but at least when you get
unreachable domain from [EMAIL PROTECTED] you'll know that
something is wrong and you should investigate to make sure your not
infected. This might have some value. :)
Wilson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
It does not matter how the virus sends the mail, all at once in the
to field, individually, reverse order, random blah blah, none of it
matters.. Having a bogus address in your address book will not stop
any of them.
Your mail client never connects to the intended receipients mail
server. Yo
On 11/19/02 7:10 AM, "Mike Lui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately this won't work on many of the newer worms that will send an
email to everyone in your address book anyway. Its all in the way it's
coded, and only a fool will let the worm stop on an bad address. They will
tell it to send
I have two questions. One is my situation, and one is a generalized
question relating to it. First, I am in a bad situation here. I have
been using all the new beta versions of packages updated off of cooker
for some time now. I was always amazed by the fact that even though
these were all bare
This ruse has been touted for quite some time,sometimes they just tell
you to put your address at top so you will have a warning.Upshot is it
precludes; does the worm/virus only sent one e-mail at a time,does it
start secquencially from first to last? (must make sure the black hats
follow the ru
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Mike Lui wrote:
This is not going to stop anything. A mail is not determined
undeliverable until you get a message from site b claiming such. This is
in no way shape or form related to you sending further outgoing mails.
That's like
me forwarding a copy of this mail to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 08:37 am, DeanFujioka wrote:
> Some console attempts to remove the older package...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] dean]$ rpm -q popt
> popt-1.7-1.06
> popt-1.7-9
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] dean]$ rpm -e popt
> error: "popt" specifies multipl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When I open synaptic I get this error message:
There are two or more versions of the package 'popt' installed in your system,
which is a situation APT can't handle cleanly at the moment.
Please do one of the following:
1)Keep at most one version of th
Hi all,
1. Any truth?
2. If it works, then it should work under any platform email client set
up?
Mike
>
Subject: FW: Thwarting email viruses
Here's a computer trick that's really ingenious in it simplicity.
As you may know, when/if a worm virus gets in
11 matches
Mail list logo
