Aloha,
I have an odd X question. I am looking for an X application like Exceed,
but I need one that runs on Solaris. I know we can redirect teh X display
to Solaris with normal X. The probem is we have a few unix applications
that take over the entire desktop. We are using multi-monitor solari
Unless your recommending OS X *^o^* But that's a whole other
architecture...
Debian is fine, however it is absurd to recommend *BSD for end-user
desktops.
I don't insist a CD/DVD install. I expect it.
I can't recommend a networked install without first knowing more about the
end user's limitations. Not only is deb's catchpenny installation
time-consuming, on an average connection, or worse, dial-up, a net install
is completely unfeasible. Esp
What does BSD have to do with Slackware?
Any early and successful user of Slackware should be able to migrate to
a *bsd.
--scott
Warren-
On September 5, 2003, RedHat filed for trademark registration of the
name "Fedora"
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=7e61u9.2.2
If I remember correctly, you have been using the trade name "Fedora" way
before that. I am sure RedHat has you signed your right to Fedora t
http://torrent.dulug.duke.edu/
Only available via bittorrent for now. FTP mirrors are coming soon
along with the official announcement. Release notes and GPG signed
md5sums are on the above URL.
ftp://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/temp/yarrow-binary-i386-iso/
ftp://mplug.oceanic.com/yarrow-binary-i386-i
howzit Karotu,
have you tried this instead?:
logon script = %U.bat
I don't know how many users you have, but I know that option works.
AFAIK, using global groups with a Samba PDC is still under development.
testparm | less
also helps...
-ho'ala
Karotu Tannang said:
> Mauri All - (Hi All)
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 23:33, R. Scott Belford wrote:
> What would happen if, say in 5 years, that Red Hat was acquired by a
> competitor or underwent management changes that did not embrace the
> partnership with Fedora. Would the Fedora name be held by the new
> company/management, or would it
