Julian Yap wrote:
SELinux is enabled by default (targeted policy) in Red Hat
Enterprise Linux and Fedora.
And it's amazing how much better Fedora runs when you turn them off. :)
--
Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org
HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky
_
--- Jim Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Linux has the SElinux extensions which are now part of the 2.6
> kernel
> series, though not enabled by default, when last I checked.
SELinux is enabled by default (targeted policy) in Red Hat
Enterprise Linux and Fedora.
In Fedora at least since ve
There are a plethora of "operating systems" one could run on a
computer. OpenBSD and Windows do not represent anything like an
endpoint on the continuum.
While the OpenBSD approach, ("inspect the source by hand", which they
term an "audit"), while yielding some results, is fundamentally f
So, let me get this straight. What are we talking about here? ONE
security 'hole' or exploit every FIVE YEARS?
As opposed to ONE "hole" punched in Windows OS every FIVE MINUTES? (Or
less?)
No brainer if you ask me. I think they're making way too much of such a
little thing comparatively speaki
On Aug 6, 2007, at 1:09 PM, 808blogger wrote:
well Keep in mind no other OS has even a close record to what the
openbsd team has done.
Please.
And dont forget that the ssh you use everyday is
written by the openbsd team, thats right. Theo and co. have done a
HUGE job
improving secur
well Keep in mind no other OS has even a close record to what the
openbsd team has done. And dont forget that the ssh you use everyday is
written by the openbsd team, thats right. Theo and co. have done a HUGE job
improving security the unix world at large.
and on the topic of this particular
and their over-hyped "security" focus. They can't even behave
responsibly when a remote execution bug shows up.
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?
module=ContentMod&action=item&id=1703
(Anyone else remember Clinton's "deny deny deny"?)
They've now been forced to change their tagline t