Hi Camron,
Cool here goes... =)
I want have 3 domain on the same server. let's call them a1.com, b2.com and
c3.com
then let say I have 3 users let's call them joe smith, joe hill and joe atta.
joe smith wants a email address as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
joe hill wants a email ad
On 10/18/07, Clifton Royston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:35:44AM -0700, goku ball z wrote:
> > Hi all, I have a question regarding postfix.
> >
> > I was searching and reading some books about postfix. But they really
> didn't get in to non unix email accounts. So
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 08:34:56AM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:35:44AM -0700, goku ball z wrote:
> > Hi all, I have a question regarding postfix.
> >
> > I was searching and reading some books about postfix. But they really
> > didn't get in to non unix emai
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:35:44AM -0700, goku ball z wrote:
> Hi all, I have a question regarding postfix.
>
> I was searching and reading some books about postfix. But they really
> didn't get in to non unix email accounts. So my question is...
> Is there a way without using mysql da
goku ball z wrote:
Hi all, I have a question regarding postfix.
I was searching and reading some books about postfix. But they really didn't get in to non unix email accounts. So my question is...
Is there a way without using mysql database to create non unix email
accounts? I know
On 10/16/07, Peter Besenbruch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > goku ball z wrote:
> >> setenv EDITOR/usr/local/bin/./nano ( which didn't work )
> >> then I tried this also
> >> setenv EDITOR/usr/local/bin/nano (which also didn't work)
Setting the EDITOR only helps when you use a program that ca
Hi all, I have a question regarding postfix.
I was searching and reading some books about postfix. But they really didn't
get in to non unix email accounts. So my question is...
Is there a way without using mysql database to create non unix email
accounts? I know that you can have ma
ah sorry I think I miss something =)
Angela Kahealani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday,2007-10-17 22:37:32
R. Scott Belford wrote:
> I've always heard about this one. Is there a story behind it other
> than a pointless argument over superlatives?
my point exactly... these things
On Wednesday,2007-10-17 22:37:32 R. Scott Belford wrote:
> I've always heard about this one. Is there a story behind it other
> than a pointless argument over superlatives?
my point exactly... these things are not resolvable,
because different people / circumstances yield different optimizations
Angela Kahealani wrote:
the REAL holy war is vi vs emacs.
I've always heard about this one. Is there a story behind it other than
a pointless argument over superlatives?
The real question of this thread is did either Peter's or Antonio's
suggestions work? They included the inquisitor wh
On Wednesday,2007-10-17 21:44:36 Sean Fairchild wrote:
> You dispute recomending people use vi which is a superior editor?
> Almost all systems have vi installed and in the default path..
> not the case for nano.
> What is more elitist is not encouraging people to use the proper
> tools!
Different
You dispute recomending people use vi which is a superior editor?
Almost all systems have vi installed and in the default path..
not the case for nano.
What is more elitist is not encouraging people to use the proper tools!
Sean
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 9:29 pm, Eric Hattemer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 808.356.2913 wrote:
> this might not sound nice but
>
> use 'vi' not 'nano'
>
> you will never feel any editor woes again
>
> Sean
> http://www.kokuatraffic.com
>
You're right, it doesn't sound nice. It sounds elitist and stupid.
-Eric Hattemer
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
