Whoever Whatever wrote:
I will nice things at different level next time to see how they
changes. I just tried to watch tv at 2200, I can see blocks, I can
tell the most when switching to a channel with some noise/snow, so
putting it back to 4500 made me happy.
Oops, I should have been more
On 6/14/05, Eric Hattemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> let's call it "nice -n -15" to be perfectly clear. But honestly, I
got it, thanks.
> Like I said, I never got around to ionice, but it looks like a great
> (and well overdue) concept. It looked like 2.6.11.11 had an option for
> ionice
Whoever Whatever wrote:
No, it wasn't KDE, I recompiled the kernel with athlon, then ended up
recompling ivtv, lirc and other needed modules, reinstalled nvidia
driver, system came up fast but with no sound. It was pretty good
with very low load average, video not jerky while compiling. I have
> >
> Someone mentioned about KDE; I think what may be more likely is the
> threads priority. If you check in top for instance, X in one of the
> systems was set to nice 0, and one was set to nice -10. I don't
> remember which of redhat/mandrake used which. Try changing the nice
> values for
