Perhaps I drank too much eggnog, but this "discussion" reminded me of...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7836547273687836884
Merry Christmas!
Happy Christmas!
Happy Holidays!
or whatever makes you smile this season!
Michael
PS - If you're not smiling at the end of the video, then plea
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Jim Thompson wrote:
I find it fascinating and somewhat sad that, rather than address the issue(s)
and/or assertions at hand, you choose to dive into the muddy waters of
personal attacks. Its is, indeed, quite odd.
I chose to stop addressing those responses because of the
I find it fascinating and somewhat sad that, rather than address the
issue(s) and/or assertions at hand, you choose to dive into the muddy
waters of personal attacks. Its is, indeed, quite odd.
Therefore, I have come to agreement with many others on this list,
and will make this my last
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Jim Thompson wrote:
[deleted examples of misinterpreation and disagreement for disagreement
sake]
Wow, I can't believe it. An entire email that contains all of the
problems from previous emails.
After going through the whole post, I can basically break down the
respons
On Dec 21, 2006, at 10:59 PM, Jimen Ching wrote:
In reviewing parts of the archive, I also see that you are
confused about the terms of the GPL.
http://lists.hosef.org/pipermail/luau/2003-October/014441.html
Point in fact, if you distribute binaries of **unmodified** code
covered by the GP
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Jim Thompson wrote:
or have you backed off from your position here:
http://lists.hosef.org/pipermail/luau/2002-September/010356.html
Perhaps specialized topics like linux for schools does not belong in a
general purpose mailing list like Luau. I believe the idea of censors
