On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 04:37:42PM -1000, Matt Darnell wrote:
> What DSL offers over cable is a consistant throughput. I know
> there is no CIR with DSL but all of our tests and outside
> sources have indicated that cable burts higher but DSL is more
> staeady. I always recommend people to get cabl
- Original Message -
From: "MonMotha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [luau] Broadband in Hawaii Notes
> > What DSL offers over cable is a consistant throughput. I know there is
no
> > CIR
What DSL offers over cable is a consistant throughput. I know there is no
CIR with DSL but all of our tests and outside sources have indicated that
cable burts higher but DSL is more staeady. I always recommend people to
get cable and home and DSL at work.
-Matt
Part of this is telephone pro
- Original Message -
From: "Warren Togami" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 3:40 PM
Subject: [luau] Broadband in Hawaii Notes
> Disclaimer: I have no financial interests in Time Warner or any of the
> companies that I m
Disclaimer: I have no financial interests in Time Warner or any of the
companies that I mention. These are purely my observations from what I
have seen, and public information available on websites. I may be
slightly biased because I had RoadRunner cable modem for many years.
Please correct me
