[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread Oliver Grawert
i'm definately for adding the metapackage to universe (even though requesting it early enough pre FF would have been a lot nicer) but i fully agree with scotts suggestion here, having an open and completely uncontrolled team anyone can subscribe to in control of the seeds seems very dangerous (any

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging]lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread hagisbasheruk
Mario wrote > I suggest to meet on IRC freenode #lubuntu > on Sep. 6, 15.00 GMT > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=5&month=9&year=2009&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=0 Mario you wrote to meet on IRC freenode #lubuntu on Sep. 6, 15.00 GMT But the link you gave is for today the 5th o

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging]lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread Mario Behling
> Mario you wrote to meet on IRC freenode #lubuntu on Sep. 6, 15.00 GMT > But the link you gave is for today the 5th of Sept @ 15.00 UTC. > Great Britain/United Kingdom is one hour ahead of UTC during summer. > Which gives us a meeting time of 14.00 local time here in the UK > Could you please clar

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:23 AM, David Sugar wrote: > Second, I suggest given that UDS for Karmic "+1" is likely going to be > in two months, that we draft a new spec for that UDS for/from and most > especially WITH the Lubuntu team and community.  Indeed, it is the > approach of UDS is one reason I

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:49 AM, hagisbasheruk wrote: > I suggest that you try to minimize any use of gnome libs as possible, use > slim instead of gdm, use Wicd for network as lxnw is too limited right now, > aumix-gtk for mixer and a program to add menu entries. 1) slim has not been packaged. A

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
Just as a general suggestion, the needs packaging bug probably isn't the best venue for these meta Lubuntu discussions. -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu, which is a direct subsc

[Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Changed in: pam (Debian) Status: New => Invalid -- [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu, which is a direct subscriber. Status in Ubuntu: New Status in “pam” package in Debian

[Lubuntu-desktop] Lubuntu default settings

2009-09-05 Thread Julien Lavergne
Hi, I pushed a branch with a initial work on a package with contain default settings for Lubuntu. My goal is to isolate settings into a separate package, so current LXDE settings can be kept for people wanted a genuine LXDE installation. You can find the branch here : https://code.launchpad.net/~