Le jeudi 17 septembre 2009 à 21:52 +0200, André Rebentisch a écrit :
> 2009/9/17 Julien Lavergne
> > Well I don't think there is such bad usability issue with
> gnome-player.
> > I can also see that this choice [of SMplayer] is against some
> principle :
> - Only use libraries from other d
"""Keep the user interface simple and intuitive. Never design some
geek-style GUI. (the GUI of gnome-mplayer is much cleaner than the
SMplayer one IMO)."""
Gnome-MPlayer is certainly simpler, but I don't think either one falls into
the "Geek-Style" UI stereotype. Your average user could probably
2009/9/17 Julien Lavergne
> Well I don't think there is such bad usability issue with gnome-player.
> I can also see that this choice [of SMplayer] is against some principle :
>
> - Only use libraries from other desktops when they are small or
> efficient enough and have few dependencies. (in this
I did not think there was a significant usability issue in gnome-player
either. I only had a minor change requested for the seed currently,
related to a different issue, but I wanted to get feedback on whether
this should be changed as well...
Julien Lavergne wrote:
> Le jeudi 17 septembre 2009 à
Le jeudi 17 septembre 2009 à 14:15 +0800, Andrew Lee a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> SMplayer
>
> As far as I remember from the application selections IRC meeting with
> other LXDE core developers, the SMplayer has been chosen because of the
> LXDE design principles:
> "Usability is always the to
I would stick with LXDE natural colors - a bit dark, but not cheerless, with
blue accents. my favourite color combination is deep black + deep navy blue
+ deep red, but I know it's not good for OS colour scheme, and I Mostly
setup for myself colours of black, grey and blue.
I'd copy colour scheme f
6 matches
Mail list logo