i8xx is actually in a pretty good state right now. In Ubuntu since Maverick,
the X server is running the fbdev driver, and all (I think) of the stability
problems are fixed, but at a noticeable performance degradation.
Upstream, a fix has been released since the 2.6.38-rc7 kernel which seems to
ma
On 09/06/2011 12:34, Jonathan Marsden wrote:
> Why? What is the value of being able to "still keep lubuntu-desktop"?
Because new packages being added to lubuntu-desktop will be pulled in when it is
upgraded. If you remote lubuntu-desktop, you won't get any of the new additions.
And it can be hard
On 06/08/2011 08:01 AM, Markus Brummer wrote:
> For 2), you can now remove "useless" programs and install
> alternatives, and still keep lubuntu-desktop installed (I currently
> use lubuntu-core and install what I need on top of that).
Why? What is the value of being able to "still keep lubuntu-
OK,
Just want to give an update. For those interested, I went back to my
install notes to see if any of the recommended packages stood out from
the pack. I installed most everything using "--without-recommends"
Here is output from when I installed lxde
root@natty:/usr/share/locale# aptitude i
Julien, just to clarify, LightDM uses 3.2Mb and LXDM 2.3 and not the
other way around? This seems a trivial difference.
You've mentioned before that support is important for a DM as it needs
to be tested across many different configurations. LightDM seems far
more active than LXDM, and in spit
This passed me by, but is not good news for the sort of machines we are
targeting.
"In natty, we stopped Ubuntu development support for the 8xx chipset; these may
still work OK with the -intel driver but we no longer field bug reports or
backport fixes for them. This policy will continue in on
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:39:42 +0200
Julien Lavergne wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm a bit late for that, but it still time to discuss such topic.
>
> LightDM [1] will be the next display manager for Ubuntu, and probably
> Xubuntu (maybe Kubuntu also !). It will replace GDM which have a tight
> dependenc
Thanks for all the replies in gedit. I've currently got no machine to test
these things, that's why it was only a proposal. I'll install it myself when
I need to use it.
With metta,
Chris Druif
On Jun 8, 2011 8:03 PM, "Jean-Pierre Vidal Piesset"
wrote:
> Gedit -1, way too slow on my old machines
Hi,
I'm a bit late for that, but it still time to discuss such topic.
LightDM [1] will be the next display manager for Ubuntu, and probably
Xubuntu (maybe Kubuntu also !). It will replace GDM which have a tight
dependency on GNOME.
LightDM has the advantage to split the greeter (the UI part) an
Gedit -1, way too slow on my old machines. (P3 and below)
--
jpxsat
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help : https://help
Hi,
I'd like to clarify my point, why dropping depencies to recommends is a
DRAW/WIN/WIN. There are three groups of people:
1) "I like lubuntu / lubuntu-desktop the way it is, please don't tinker around"
2) "I want another program for my needs than what lubuntu-desktop is proposing"
3) "I'm low
Am Mittwoch 08 Juni 2011, 15:23:56 schrieb 神癒礁湖 "(Rafael Laguna)":
> It's slow for me too. Even in Gnome, when using two or three plugins
> it's annoying. Another option could be Scribes. It's a bit strange, but
> it has syntax highlighting and doesn't have too much dependencies. But I
> don't know
It's slow for me too. Even in Gnome, when using two or three plugins
it's annoying. Another option could be Scribes. It's a bit strange, but
it has syntax highlighting and doesn't have too much dependencies. But I
don't know if its development status.
--
Go to rafaellaguna.com
Go to Lubuntu.net
13 matches
Mail list logo
