Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] USC

Please use Glade to edit GtkBuilder. Don't use Gaspacho. Nobody edits the xml files by hands. GtkBuilder is the way to go. On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Stefano wrote: > i prefere the code, because the xml files (gtk.builder file) are too > difficult to edit by hand. anyway can gazpacho work fo

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] USC

i prefere the code, because the xml files (gtk.builder file) are too difficult to edit by hand. anyway can gazpacho work for it? On 02/08/2011 19:00, Julien Lavergne wrote: > Le Tuesday 02 August 2011 à 11:10 +0200, Stefano a écrit : >> thank you, will we use gtk.Builder to build the UI or simple-

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] USC

Le Tuesday 02 August 2011 à 11:10 +0200, Stefano a écrit : > thank you, will we use gtk.Builder to build the UI or simple-clean > code > (e.g. self.button = gtk.Button("press me!")? It's probably simpler to use gtk.Builder. Regards, Julien Lavergne _

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Second Test Lubuntu Lucid 10.04.3 ISO image available

It's not overly pretty, but I've thrown a quick self building listing together for the iso's I hold on my server, with md5 / sha1 files where I have those as well. http://phillw.net/ISOs/ Regards, Phill. On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Jonathan Marsden wrote: > On 08/0

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] new ubuntu software center

On 02/08/2011 13:59, Tim Bernhard wrote: > Peppermint has one. Maybe we should look at that? > > Tim > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Stefano wrote: > >> yeah, i agree, it looks orrible. >> synaptic is written in C (++?), i know only python as language... >> Mint software center have review

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] new ubuntu software center

Peppermint has one. Maybe we should look at that? Tim On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Stefano wrote: > yeah, i agree, it looks orrible. > synaptic is written in C (++?), i know only python as language... > Mint software center have reviews and other unuseful things, but it > could be better th

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Lubuntu Alpha 3 testing

u should use the images from: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/20110801/ Tomorrow might bring "Lubuntu Desktop i386 (20110802)", which means the images would be in: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/20110802/and so on. I have a feeling you might already know this a

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] new ubuntu software center

yeah, i agree, it looks orrible. synaptic is written in C (++?), i know only python as language... Mint software center have reviews and other unuseful things, but it could be better than USC. On 02/08/2011 11:51, Benny Hult wrote: > Looks horrible and its full of "Free" software, > like Android M

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] new ubuntu software center

Looks horrible and its full of "Free" software, like Android Market or other samekind of variants. Propably that kind of software is needed for marketing OS for the masses. Typing mystical spells into a blackbox is just too geek even for the hipsters using OS X ;) If I could code, I would rather

[Lubuntu-desktop] new ubuntu software center

here the new layout of ubuntu software center for oneiric (with webkit). http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/08/ubuntu-software-centre-lands-oneiric/ the cleanup will be very hard. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : lubun

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] USC

On 02/08/2011 01:11, Julien Lavergne wrote: > Le Saturday 30 July 2011 à 17:03 +0200, Stefano a écrit : >> hi, i had a look to the ubuntu-software-center branch, my consideration are: >> 1 - the branch is not so clear (imho) >> 2 - USC uses app-install-data, wich was part of gnome-app-install, an >

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Lubuntu Alpha 3 testing

ing "Lubuntu Desktop i386 (20110802)", which means the images would be in: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/20110802/<http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily-live/20110801/> and so on. I have a feeling you might already know this and are just reporting a bug (in which case