Yes.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Andrew Woodhead <
andrew.woodhead...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I don't contest the results but can someone explain how a lighter DE uses
> less power? Is it because the CPU is used less so takes less juice?
> Nice article though. KDE is really bloated and the K
Hello,
As Texas' next Governor, Bill White will challenge Texans to lead, not
leave, the United States. Our state deserves leaders who can bring
people together and move our state forward.
As Mayor of Houston, Bill was twice re-elected with margins averaging
88% of the vote. He earned the trust o
+1
2010/2/28 神癒礁湖
> Another suggestion. It would be great to have a notes applications, like
> Tomboy, bu without its resource hungry. So I think XPAD would be great. What
> do you think?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Mailing list:
> https://launchpad.net/~l
+1 4 Blue.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Sylkis wrote:
> I still like blue better. for me it doesn't really matter that there
> are othes blue distros, it's just a good looking colour and I gues
> everything's aesthetical with it, unlike with green imo. I mea, it is
> possible to make sth loo
This is shaping up very very well.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Steve wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 01:13:19 -, Julien Lavergne
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I just created a new testing ISO. This is not an Alpha, but just a
>> snapshot of the current work to be able to test more the new featu
Alright! Thanks mate.
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just created a new testing ISO. This is not an Alpha, but just a
> snapshot of the current work to be able to test more the new features.
> Like others Alpha, you should be aware that it's not considered st
Fantastic! Thank you.
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, I would like to thanks all people for their feedbacks.
> Also, I know people will be disagree about some choices, but we can't
> make all people agreed :) Remember that the goal is to provide a
> distr
Doug , Honestly dude wouldn't you rather "Celebrate" the holiday? Yea me
to...lol.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Douglas Stanley wrote:
> This is also St. Valentines day here in the states. Some of us (like
> my self) may not be able to make
> it due to the "wife getting pissed at me for spend
I agree , Also Chrome seems to handle web services better and the addons are
going to be cross platform for the most part.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:09 PM, wrote:
> Hey if chromium is pulling those types of low numbers then there is no
> question any ram saved on an old pute is a life line.
Sorry dude but I don't see any reason why Lubuntu would need a compiler
unless the user decided to use one , But thanks for the heads up , nice
prog. Cheers.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:58 AM, gusions wrote:
> Hi i will talk about a new software: Ubucompilator (lubucompilator for
> lxde user)!
>
>
You can also command line install from the mini.iso and then grab the meta
packages from launchpad , that's the most up to date way of doing it as of
now. afaik there's no official test iso right now.
Cheers.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Zoltan Matlak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There has been lot
I agree with David. Also anyone who is performing these highly specialized
installations is certainly going to have the knowledge required to open the
command line and "sudo apt-get whatever gui or lack thereof" he/she wants.
n Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:26 PM, David Sugar wrote:
> I actually was no
He probably just installed via command line.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Adam Gonnerman wrote:
> Sorry. Duh. Of course I meant "nowhere near ready."
>
> Adam Gonnerman
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Adam Gonnerman
> wrote:
>
>> I think it's generally understood that Lubuntu is n
Right now you can just perform a command line installation and then add the
Lxde packages
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Mike Shaw wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know you can throw LXDE on an Ubuntu a million different ways but
> what is the preferred method? Should this be used as a reference:
>
> h
Scott , We are all grown folks and we also understand that David Sugar is
more or less the boss here , There will be no foul play.
Now let's be positive and congratulate everyone on a job well done and wish
everyone a Fantastic week end of whatever tickles your fancy!
Cheers folks! It's POETS.
I agree with Martin-Éric Racine and thanks for the patch as well ,
Cheers.
2009/8/30 Martin-Éric Racine
> Looking at what the resulting lubuntu-desktop package tries to pull:
>
> 1) sysinfo -- As this pulls the whole MONO framework along, I contend
> that the inclusion of this is contrary to the
at 7:28 PM, Liam Proven wrote:
> 2009/7/8 Dallas Wiebelhaus :
> > The U-Lite Creator Shae Smittle is on board for this endeavor:
> >
> > http://u-lite.org/content/status-updates
>
> I know. He told me about this product and this list. He's helping you
> out, givin
The U-Lite Creator Shae Smittle is on board for this endeavor:
http://u-lite.org/content/status-updates
You guys should relax , these things take a while and everyone is busy ,
Things are progressing at individual levels right now so that once everyone
gets together for some real progress we will
It may Also benefit you to read what's already in place:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Specs/UbuntuLxdeDesktop
http://www.lxde.org/
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:49 PM, David Sugar wrote:
>
I gathered from here:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop
After the next IRC meeting , in the 2 week range , excluding the Holiday I'm
sure.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:25 AM, jon york wrote:
> Hi Guys and Gals,
>
> just wondering if we could have an
I have both successfully built both a "Full featured" Desktop and a
"Minimalist Base install" but not without issues.
First being native network browsing , Pcfileman is unable to do this without
manually mounting the shares via the CLI. Maybe a script master could work
something up?
Second being
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dallas Wiebelhaus
Date: Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Lubuntu could end up like Xubuntu (Heavy &
Slow)
To: David Sugar
I'm going to back off for a little bit and see how things pan out , I'll
continue to
Give me a few days (as the work week is here) And I can get something ready
that we can pass around. That is with the go ahead from the people running
this thing , I was told on IRC that they were still working on something
before releasing an ISO , But in any case now or later I'm willing to do
th
Stabilized without hiccups at 128mb ram , that's without youtube lagging out
, you can go lower no doubt.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Dallas Wiebelhaus wrote:
> By the way , Chrome fits in like it's native and is running hella fast on
> this DE on my test box. I'm a
By the way , Chrome fits in like it's native and is running hella fast on
this DE on my test box. I'm about to crank the ram down and see how low I
can get.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Andrew Woodhead <
andrew.woodhead...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> This is kinda surplus, the system is still ub
Hey! That's great no need for details if they are private I just wanted to
make sure by getting involved there was not going to be any toes being
stepped on.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:16 PM, C David Rigby wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 18:46 -0500, Dallas Wiebelhaus wrote:
> > For
>
> We are very happy that Shae of U-lite is also a member of lubuntu.
>
> -- Mario
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Dallas Wiebelhaus
> wrote:
> > For some reason I had forgotten that U-Lite was using LXDE , I thought
> they
> > were using XFCE , maybe becaus
I just threw together with LXDE and Ubuntu base for experimentation and
abiword does run much better then openoffice on this DE it seems , I'm sure
others will perform their own tests but I just wanted to let you guys know
that I'm testing some things , like some of the idea's that were suggested
t
For some reason I had forgotten that U-Lite was using LXDE , I thought they
were using XFCE , maybe because of the recent alpha screenshots.
I just want to make sure that the Lubuntu people are Aware of U-Lite are
these two projects related or completely separate?
http://u-lite.org/
_
e just
> isn't suitable but will be accessible via reops if you must install it. I
> personally only use abiword and know a great many users who have the entire
> suite installed and only use the writer. Its laughable.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Dallas Wiebelhaus
I agree Abiword is so incredibly fast and small and if someone has not tried
it they should give it a spin , it's a brilliant little application! I could
foresee someone adding openoffice if they needed that extra functionality
but for simple out of the box word processing in a small efficient quic
that make it a viable
> solution as a media player?
>
> I am looking more into it...
>
> Adam
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Dallas Wiebelhaus
> wrote:
>
>> Also we could learn a allot from the puppy project they have already
>> banged out years of
Good eye there David!
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:15 PM, David Sugar wrote:
> Related to this question is what to do with what is currently the
> separate lxde blueprint in Launchpad:
>
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-karmic-lxde-ubuntu-desktop
>
> I would be happy to see a
Also we could learn a allot from the puppy project they have already banged
out years of learning the hardway! And today they have the quintessential
light weight desktop of out of the box that can run on anything after a 486.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Ed Hewitt wrote:
> I think we should
Thanks!
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:16 PM, jon york wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> here is the forum location, just a quick and free forum for us, I am a
> webmaster, and own my own host, so we can discuss that later when we
> actually have a beta version to release to public, and we are ready to
> submit
I vote go small , if someone wants songbird or Firefox or liferea or pidgin
let them fetch it.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
x27;t think anyone has to worry about something missing because the people
that would be drawn to Lubuntu would certinaly be savvy enough to fetch it
for themselves.
What's good isn't always golden , I agree with the minilmist idea that Ed
Hewitt proposed here.
Cheers!.
Dallas Wiebelha
37 matches
Mail list logo
