Through New as well and in the archive.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.
Status
version 0.4 uploaded, waiting in NEW.
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.
Status in Ubuntu: In Progress
Status in “pam” package in Debian: Invalid
B
Un-subscribing universe-sponsors as Julien is on it, and he no longer
needs a sponsor. =)
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.
Status in Ubuntu: In Pr
Thanks for the FFe.
I'll take care of uploading it shortly, if somebody have modification to
include.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) => Julien Lavergne (gilir)
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notifi
Hi,
sorry for not having made it clear yet. As I asked ogra and he gave a +1
I certainly do second this position. FFe granted hence, please go ahead.
Cheers, and sorry again for the delay,
Stefan.
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet)
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a dir
I don't see it as a blocker.
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.
Status in Ubuntu: New
Status in “pam” package in Debian: Invalid
Bug description:
I
Just to have a clarification, is the open-team a blocker for MOTU-Release ACK ?
Even if it could generate some problems in Lubuntu team itself, a MOTU
sponsorship is still needed to modify the seed package in the archive.
This open-team issue is still under discussion in the Lubuntu team.
--
[n
** Changed in: pam (Debian)
Status: New => Invalid
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.
Status in Ubuntu: New
Status in “pam” package in Debian
Just as a general suggestion, the needs packaging bug probably isn't the
best venue for these meta Lubuntu discussions.
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subsc
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:49 AM, hagisbasheruk wrote:
> I suggest that you try to minimize any use of gnome libs as possible, use
> slim instead of gdm, use Wicd for network as lxnw is too limited right now,
> aumix-gtk for mixer and a program to add menu entries.
1) slim has not been packaged. A
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:23 AM, David Sugar wrote:
> Second, I suggest given that UDS for Karmic "+1" is likely going to be
> in two months, that we draft a new spec for that UDS for/from and most
> especially WITH the Lubuntu team and community. Indeed, it is the
> approach of UDS is one reason I
> Mario you wrote to meet on IRC freenode #lubuntu on Sep. 6, 15.00 GMT
> But the link you gave is for today the 5th of Sept @ 15.00 UTC.
> Great Britain/United Kingdom is one hour ahead of UTC during summer.
> Which gives us a meeting time of 14.00 local time here in the UK
> Could you please clar
Mario wrote
> I suggest to meet on IRC freenode #lubuntu
> on Sep. 6, 15.00 GMT
>
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=5&month=9&year=2009&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=0
Mario you wrote to meet on IRC freenode #lubuntu on Sep. 6, 15.00 GMT
But the link you gave is for today the 5th o
i'm definately for adding the metapackage to universe (even though
requesting it early enough pre FF would have been a lot nicer) but i
fully agree with scotts suggestion here, having an open and completely
uncontrolled team anyone can subscribe to in control of the seeds seems
very dangerous (any
> Thanks for making this clear. The goal for lubuntu was from the start to
> build a strong and broad
> community, that can take care of tasks. For example Debian packages that
> have been made
> available during recent months by Andrew Lee and others were also planned and
> released
> to lay t
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:13 PM, David Sugar wrote:
> Lol! While I appreciate the vote of confidence, the goal was NEVER to
> have a dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise!
Thanks for making this clear. The goal for lubuntu was from the start
to build a strong and broad community, that can ta
Thank you for the input about the ISO that was tested. As stated the
ISO is not a final release. Some of the changes you suggested have
already been incorporated. Others will be as we go on. We will soon be
uploading a new test iso.
All the best,
Mario
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:49 AM, hagisbashe
i have been running LXDE from a cli install on my Tatung / RM – RTABB12D using
both a genkernel and a custom built onefor quite some time now.
I suggest that you try to minimize any use of gnome libs as possible, use slim
instead of gdm, use Wicd for network as lxnw is too limited right now,aumix
Sounds to me like you are moving in the right direction. +1.
I'll volunteer to do the archive admin review after it's uploaded.
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a dir
gah - sorry, wrong bug...
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #545086
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545086
** Also affects: pam (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545086
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: pam (Debia
2009/9/4 David Sugar
> There is a launchpad team for Lubuntu, and there is a process for
> community input through the wiki, but not a formal governance process as
> yet,
>
What precisely is required, and how could the LXDE Foundation provide
assistance?
-- A
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desk
Lol! While I appreciate the vote of confidence, the goal was NEVER to
have a dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise!
I think what Scott says about some form of formalizing governance is
actually very correct. However, the meta package (any meta-package
instance) has a "snapshot" instance of the s
Scott , We are all grown folks and we also understand that David Sugar is
more or less the boss here , There will be no foul play.
Now let's be positive and congratulate everyone on a job well done and wish
everyone a Fantastic week end of whatever tickles your fancy!
Cheers folks! It's POETS.
Additionally, the seeds are currently controlled by an open team with
118 members. I do not see this as a recipe for success.
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct
OK. My concern is that there be some agreement on what goes in this
metapackage before it gets approved to go in, so we don't have a lot of
contention afterwards (I'm not saying adjustments won't be needed).
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You r
Scott, it was not anticipated there would be spins hosted on Launchpad
for Lubuntu for Karmic, just the meta package. What happens Karmic +X
though may become a different question.
There is a launchpad team for Lubuntu, and there is a process for
community input through the wiki, but not a formal
In principle adding a metapackage is not a big deal. Do you expect ISO
images for lubuntu to be built on Launchpad? Do you have a governance
process for deciding what should be in the package?
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug
Hi,
just subscribed ogra and StevenK. ogra: you've registered the spec in
the first place, how do you feel about adding that meta package at this
point in the release cycle? I assume this mainly impacts MID?
@StevenK: If this mainly impacts MID, then I guess it's your domain ;).
Cheers,
Ste
This really did not get handled correctly at the start of the week as we
were requested to have this in a hurry and then learned after it could
not be sponsored prior to the ffe process. I have put it in revu to
correct any outstanding issue so that it can at least be properly
evaluated.
http://r
Why do we need both Mirage and GPicView at the same time? GPicView has a
much better user interface. Why not stick to that?
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct su
Just to put some wording for the FFe request for MOTU Release :
This a new meta-package to build a new flavor for Ubuntu, base on LXDE. Please
consider the FFe as it blocks the work on official ISO and standard
installation, and also progress on this new flavor.
You can see more information abo
This had to be in this morning, so I only had time to incorporate
Martin-Éric Racine's changes to the meta and seed. The tarball has the
source, dsc, and changes files needed to build.
** Attachment added: "lubuntu-meta-srcbld.tar.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31123466/lubuntu-meta-srcbl
I suggest putting the LXDE icon in the centre of the circle much like
Xubuntu puts the XFCE mouse in te logo.
2009/9/1 Martin-Éric Racine
> The blue theme doesn't differentiate enough from KDE. We need to use
> other colors. How about these? (attachment)
>
> ** Attachment added: "lubuntu-log
The blue theme doesn't differentiate enough from KDE. We need to use
other colors. How about these? (attachment)
** Attachment added: "lubuntu-logo.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31098584/lubuntu-logo.png
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
@Martin-Éric
You can found some details about bzr here : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bzr .
Basically, you just need to branch the lubuntu-meta branch
(https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop/+junk/lubuntu-meta), make
your modifications, push your branch somewhere, and propose to merge your
Hi,
I like those designs, but I am not decided which way I like most. I
think we can also gather more design suggestions and it is always
easier to see, than to hear how something looks like.
Fedora created an adapted them for the LXDE spin. Openbox is just one
part, we also need to create athe t
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Mario Behling wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> enclosed a few desktop backgrounds and images I collected from the
> lubuntu designer forum at the lxde website.
>
> Please include.
I personally like the all-blue background with the bubbly logo best.
I'd however omit the LXDE
I like them, especially logo 2
Glen
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Mario Behling wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> enclosed a few desktop backgrounds and images I collected from the
> lubuntu designer forum at the lxde website.
>
> Please include.
>
> Best,
>
> Mario
>
> __
Dear all,
enclosed a few desktop backgrounds and images I collected from the
lubuntu designer forum at the lxde website.
Please include.
Best,
Mario
** Attachment added: "lubuntu-design.zip"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31051972/lubuntu-design.zip
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop me
Dear all,
lynxis has put together a lubuntu-iso to test:
http://lynxis.crew.c-base.org
All the best,
Mario
2009/8/31 Martin-Éric Racine :
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Julien
> Lavergne wrote:
>> @Martin-Éric
>> An exception is only necessary for the first inclusion of the package.
>>
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Julien
Lavergne wrote:
> @Martin-Éric
> An exception is only necessary for the first inclusion of the package.
> Adjusting dependencies (default applications) can be made without exceptions
> (unless most of applications changed).
Ah, that's good to hear.
> IMO
@Martin-Éric
An exception is only necessary for the first inclusion of the package.
Adjusting dependencies (default applications) can be made without exceptions
(unless most of applications changed). The main point, like David said, is the
split or not of the seed because it will probably need a
I had wanted to get feedback sooner and hence see this done earlier.
Most if not all of these changes noted are certainly valid. Where we
touch upon what the default apps should be, my only concern is that we
do not have a lot of revs. If we are going to split the seed to produce
variants of def
Julien, I know that we are in Feature Freeze. Since this package hasn't
yet entered KArmic, we must therefore do it right the first time,
because there won't be many exceptions to get it in.
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug not
@Martin-Eric
you should publish a bzr branch and propose to merge with the current one for
all the fixes you done. It should be easier than a patch.
Also, the choice of defaults applications should be discuss separately, the
more important for now is to add the package itself to the repository. I
I agree with Martin-Éric Racine and thanks for the patch as well ,
Cheers.
2009/8/30 Martin-Éric Racine
> Looking at what the resulting lubuntu-desktop package tries to pull:
>
> 1) sysinfo -- As this pulls the whole MONO framework along, I contend
> that the inclusion of this is contrary to the
Looking at what the resulting lubuntu-desktop package tries to pull:
1) sysinfo -- As this pulls the whole MONO framework along, I contend
that the inclusion of this is contrary to the goal of keeping Lubuntu
lightweight, so I'd recommend its removal.
2) gstreamer0.10-alsa -- We already depend on
Here's a patch with the resulting changes.
** Attachment added: "lubuntu-meta_02_to_03.diff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31004713/lubuntu-meta_02_to_03.diff
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a
Lintian also reports the following:
Now running lintian...
W: lubuntu-meta source: package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version 4
W: lubuntu-meta source: diff-contains-bzr-control-dir .bzr
W: lubuntu-desktop: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file
W: lubuntu-desktop: unknown-section metapackages
E:
Two bugs in the debian/rules file:
1) Typo:
make: *** "build-stamp"-kohteen tarvitseman kohteen "lubutu-i386" tuottamiseen
ei ole sääntöä. Seis.
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
The build-stamp should be called lubuntu, not lubutu (missing N).
2) Misses th
Hi,
lubuntu and lubuntu karmic seeds are here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Best,
Mario
2009/8/29 Martin-Éric Racine :
> Under which package name can we see those packages?
>
> --
> [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
> You received th
Under which package name can we see those packages?
--
[needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Lubuntu,
which is a direct subscriber.
Status in Ubuntu: In Progress
Bug description:
I have a prel
*** This is an automated message ***
This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for
a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug
reports specification,
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs-
packaging bug reports have
54 matches
Mail list logo
