hi,
i saw some changes on the MultiTermQuery, it is abstract and there is no getQuery()
anymore. How do i get all the terms from all the classes that extends MultiTermQuery ??
Anybody can help me? i am moving my software to latest version, currently is 1.2 in my
application.
thank you.
That seems to be empty
--Clemens
- Original Message -
From: "Ype Kingma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 7:24 PM
Subject: User documentation for scoring
> Dear developers,
>
> Attached is a first attempt for some user documentation for
> scori
On Sunday 23 February 2003 21:41, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Hello,
>
> --- Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > I like this approach of modifying the query parser through
> > subclassing.
> >
> > We should consider taking this approach further, e.g., perhaps by
> > making
> > addC
On Monday 24 February 2003 04:39, none none wrote:
> hi,
> i saw some changes on the MultiTermQuery, it is abstract and there is no
> getQuery() anymore. How do i get all the terms from all the classes that
> extends MultiTermQuery ?? Anybody can help me? i am moving my software to
> latest version
I'm ok with this, given the lack of a better option. Please ensure that
the input and output streams are closed in a finally block, though.
Scott
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
I hate having to make the suggested change for the reasons Matt
mentioned as disadvantages belowbut what is one to do?
I
Yeah, I already changed that. Thanks for checking!
Otis
--- Scott Ganyo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm ok with this, given the lack of a better option. Please ensure
> that
> the input and output streams are closed in a finally block, though.
>
> Scott
>
> Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
> >I h
yes, ok , i understod... but, are you telling me Lucene is going backward instead of
forward? in the previous release was possible get terms from a MultiTermQuery, now not
anymore?
i think there has to be a way to get Term from those query that extends MultiTermQuery.
Anybody can help please?
t
Was reading http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/fileformats.html and noticed that
files .f1, f2, ... are not mentioned, but a file called .nrm is.
Are the .f1, .f2, ... files that are created in my index directory by
DocumentWriter.writeNorms(Document doc, String segment) the .nrm file that is
Tatu Saloranta wrote:
It would be nice if all queries would have a method that allows terms to be
collected, ie. so that Query base class would have an abstract method.
Visitor pattern might make most sense; so we could have a TermCollector
object, and queries could have method like:
void collec
Yes. The .f[0...] files are indeed the norm files. There is one file
for each indexed field and each file contains a one-byte normalization
factor for each document.
This is a documentation bug. There is no .nrm file with per-document
normalization files, rather multiple .f files, one per in
Martin Sevigny wrote:
Looking (and testing) range queries (in particular date interval
queries), I think there is a problem with how Lucene handles filters
when a multisearcher is used.
I think this works correctly. If you are convinced there is a bug,
please submit a test case.
Basically, a Fil
hi, i appreciate see you guys planning for a new feature of Lucene, but this topic
started a with a question, it is possible get a list of terms from MultiTermQuery?? as
it was possible in the release 1.2.
Thank you,
--
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 08:51:22
Doug Cutting wrote:
>Tatu Saloranta wrot
none none wrote:
hi, i appreciate see you guys planning for a new feature of Lucene, but this topic started a with a question, it is possible get a list of terms from MultiTermQuery?? as it was possible in the release 1.2.
This feature before relied on a few bugs. One was that, when a
MultiTermQ
Terry, Otis, Clemens,
One more try to correct the lucene-dev email address.
Monday evening blues I guess...
>Ype,
>
>I couldn't find/open any attachment. Would you try to send it to me
>directly? I'd very much like to read and help revise the document.
O well, I changed email program and it _
--
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:04:30
Doug Cutting wrote:
>none none wrote:
>> hi, i appreciate see you guys planning for a new feature of Lucene, but this topic
>> started a with a question, it is possible get a list of terms from MultiTermQuery??
>> as it was possible in the release 1.2.
>
>Th
On Monday 24 February 2003 08:47, none none wrote:
> yes, ok , i understod... but, are you telling me Lucene is going backward
> instead of forward? in the previous release was possible get terms from a
No, I was just explaining how generalizing the solution would make it easier
to get terms fro
Doug Cutting wrote:
> No. The Filter.bits(IndexReader) method has not yet been
> called at this
> point. That method is called by the Searchable.search()
> implementation.
> that is called here. So, with a MultiSearcher, a different
> bit vector
> is created for each of the searchers cont
+1 on the concept of a literal term query. Syntax I'm not particular
about, but single quotes seem fine to me.
On Sunday, February 23, 2003, at 01:35 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hello Matthew,
Nobody responded to this one.
Any strong opinions about including this from developers?
I thought t
18 matches
Mail list logo
