RE : RE : RE : Test issue with new version of .tis file

2004-01-21 Thread julien
This is strange, may be the classes I retrieve from the CVS repository are not good (for unknown reason, may be I'm the reason). I ran the test with jre 1.3.1 under Websphere studio application developper 5.0 on windows 2000. I'll try tomorrow with jdk 1.4.1 on command line may be

RE: RE : RE : Test issue with new version of .tis file

2004-01-21 Thread Bob Muller
I don't know whether this is Julien's problem, but a few weeks ago I got a similar error running Lucene 1.3 from a servlet running under Tomcat 4.0.6 running as a service (OK when running standalone 4.0.6). The code works fine under 4.1 Tomcat running as a service. Probably some kind of configurati

Re: RE : RE : Test issue with new version of .tis file

2004-01-21 Thread Doug Cutting
I am unable to reproduce this with your test code. It works fine for me. What JVM and OS are you using? I tried Sun's 1.4.2 on Linux and 1.4.1 on Windows XP. I had to modify a few things to get your code to work. Some long lines were wrapped, and the index path was absolute. I attached the

RE : RE : Test issue with new version of .tis file

2004-01-21 Thread julien
I didn't have an account to bug database, here is the code : ## import java.io.File; import java.io.IOException; import java.util.Random; import org.apache.lucene.analysis.WhitespaceAnalyzer; import org.apache.lucene.document.Document; import org.apache.lucene.do

RE : RE : Test issue with new version of .tis file

2004-01-21 Thread julien
I didn't have an account to bug database, here is the code : ## import java.io.File; import java.io.IOException; import java.util.Random; import org.apache.lucene.analysis.WhitespaceAnalyzer; import org.apache.lucene.document.Document; import org.apache.lucene.do

Re: RE : Test issue with new version of .tis file

2004-01-21 Thread Doug Cutting
julien wrote: I wrote a class ( attached to the mail) wich always throw the exception. Thanks! However I didn't get the attachment. Perhaps you could attach it to a bug report? Thanks, Doug - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

RE : Test issue with new version of .tis file

2004-01-21 Thread julien
Hi all, Doug, I wrote a class ( attached to the mail) wich always throw the exception. The program generate random data, so the data are not the problem, but perhaps the amount of data added. I didn't try to debug by myself (lack of time, but next week, perhaps, I could help on this). I test the

Re: Offer to help with the qaulity of Lucene

2004-01-21 Thread Erik Hatcher
E-mail is fine with me. These may not be something we need to track in Bugzilla yet. Erik On Jan 21, 2004, at 1:31 PM, Kent Mitchell wrote: O.K. what's the best way to do it? Via the Bugzilla database or via email, or??? I'll usually be able to give you the following data: Stack trace

RE: Offer to help with the qaulity of Lucene

2004-01-21 Thread Kent Mitchell
O.K. what's the best way to do it? Via the Bugzilla database or via email, or??? I'll usually be able to give you the following data: Stack trace Data values (both pre and post call) Exception information Observed behaviors. Kent -Original Message- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[E

Re: Offer to help with the qaulity of Lucene

2004-01-21 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Jan 21, 2004, at 11:08 AM, Kent Mitchell wrote: In the process of doing the evaluation, we uncovered a few interesting issues that might be worth looking into. Since I have no expertise with the code (I just downloaded it and ran the code), I'm not confident the issues we uncovered would be c

Offer to help with the qaulity of Lucene

2004-01-21 Thread Kent Mitchell
Gentlemen, I work Agitar Software, a new startup company that produces Java unit testing tools. As part of an exercise we downloaded the Lucene code and ran it trough our testing tools. We did this because we were working with John Udell from InfoWorld and he had use a .Net port of Lucerne to ev

Re: Dmitry Document Vector Code

2004-01-21 Thread Karl Koch
Can you email the code to me? > Unfortunately, it is not as straightforward. The code is for 1.2 of > Lucene and needs a some work to upgrade to 1.3. Some people on the list > had started working on it, but I don't know what became of it. > > Here are some links from an older discussion from