Lucene comes with demo apps that you can learn from. You can read about it
here http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/demo.html
Aviran
http://aviran.mordos.com
-Original Message-
From: PROYECTA.Fernandez Garcia, Ivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 10:18 AM
To
u can't get the
field's value.
Aviran
-Original Message-
From: Haipeng Du [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: I am new to lucene
Thanks Aviran.
But how could I use content to search the document if I use
Field.Text
need to use
- Original Message -
From: "Aviran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Lucene Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 5:41 PM
Subject: RE: RangeQuery without ending term?
> Just put null at the end.
>
FBox which can extract text
from a PDF document.
Aviran
-Original Message-
From: Haipeng Du [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I am new to lucene
Hi, everyone:
I am new to Lucene. There are some questions I want to know why.
Just put null at the end.
Aviran
-Original Message-
From: Murat Ozcan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 10:36 AM
To: Lucene Developers List
Subject: RangeQuery without ending term?
Is there any way to create a query like this
- select all matches which are
ield)
throws IOException {
-field = field.intern();
+ field = field.intern();
Object ret = lookup (reader, field, SortField.AUTO);
if (ret == null) {
TermEnum enumerator = reader.terms (new Term (field, ""));
-Original Message-
From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[
Do you think that another FieldCache implementation will be beneficiary for
those who want to sort on any field other than keyword.
I bet that a lot of developers will want to have the ability to sort on ANY
field, without having to duplicate all the fields as keywords.
Aviran
-Original
ad of
just the term, this way the result is sorted by the actual field's value and
not the tokenized, analyzed term, which can be the identical for several
different values.
For Example:
John R Smith = John Smith
Thoughts ?
Aviran
Index: Sort.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvspublic/jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/Sort.java,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 Sort.java
--- Sort.java 5 Apr 2004 17:23:38 - 1.7
+++ Sort.java 21 Jul 2004
I believe so. This is a pretty significant bug.
Aviran
-Original Message-
From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 15:33 PM
To: Lucene Developers List
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Bug 30240] - FieldCacheImpl cache gets rebuilt every
time
I wonder if we
Works like a charm (-:
-Original Message-
From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 15:10 PM
To: Lucene Developers List
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Bug 30240] - FieldCacheImpl cache gets rebuilt every
time
Aviran wrote:
> Entry (IndexReader rea
Index: FieldCacheImpl.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvspublic/jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/FieldCacheI
mpl.java,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 FieldCacheImpl.java
--- FieldCacheImpl.java 24 May 2004 22:51:42 -00
his sounds reasonable to me. Can you please send a diff, complete with
javadoc, etc?
Aviran wrote:
> I'm have my own Collector and I would like to use the Sort object
> within my collector, but SortField[] fields; is not accessible outside
> Lucene's package. Can you please con
change the code and recompile Lucene. But it would be nice to
use the standard implementation.
Aviran
Aviran wrote:
> My test index is pretty small size, about 250 documents and about 24
> fields in each document. The test is done by starting 10 threads that
> repeat simple one word query (each thread query on a different word).
> Neither range nor wildcard query is done.
> I l
he stack trace.
I use a single searcher which never gets closed.
Aviran
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
leanQuery.java
:165)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:154)
Aviran
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 10:08 AM
To: Lucene Developers List
Subject: Re: FW: Lucene Search has poor cpu utilization
ce
(number of searches per second).
This issue was raised on Lucene user group, in which Doug suggested I submit
a patch to the developer mailing list. So here it is attached to this
email.
I also reported this issue in bugzilla (Bug 30058)
Than
18 matches
Mail list logo
