Re: COMMENT REQUESTED: Lucene 1.2 Final Release

2002-06-27 Thread Lex Lawrence
Was using Ant 1.3. Problem dissapeared with Ant 1.4.1. Thanks. -Lex >From: Dmitry Serebrennikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Lucene Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: COMMENT REQUESTED:

Re: COMMENT REQUESTED: Lucene 1.2 Final Release

2002-06-25 Thread Dmitry Serebrennikov
I remember seeing something like that when I used an older version of Ant to compile Lucene. What Ant version were you using, Lex? Dmitry. Lex Lawrence wrote: > Maybe I'm off my rocker, or maybe I've overlooked something. > Regardless, if nobody else noticed anything I'll just drop it gracefu

Re: COMMENT REQUESTED: Lucene 1.2 Final Release

2002-06-25 Thread Lex Lawrence
t;To: Lucene Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: COMMENT REQUESTED: Lucene 1.2 Final Release >Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 09:25:55 -0700 (PDT) > >I can't replicate that. >I moved my jakarta-site2 away, renamed it, while I left the property in >default.properties as: &

Re: COMMENT REQUESTED: Lucene 1.2 Final Release

2002-06-25 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
an tell them to install Anakia, or just create an empty > >>directory "../jakarta-site2/lib". My understanding is that > Site2/Anakia > >>are > >>only needed for creating the Lucene HTML pages. > >> > >>Perhaps there is a better solution, b

Re: COMMENT REQUESTED: Lucene 1.2 Final Release

2002-06-25 Thread Lex Lawrence
ne HTML pages. >> >>Perhaps there is a better solution, but I think as a minumum a couple >>words of explanation should be added to BUILD.txt. >> >>-Lex >> >> >> >From: Peter Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >Reply-To: "Lucene Devel

Re: COMMENT REQUESTED: Lucene 1.2 Final Release

2002-06-05 Thread Lex Lawrence
a minumum a couple words of explanation should be added to BUILD.txt. -Lex >From: Peter Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Lucene Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: COMMENT REQUESTED: Luce

Re: COMMENT REQUESTED: Lucene 1.2 Final Release

2002-06-04 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
I downloaded the source .tar.gz version and built it myself using 'ant jar'. The resulting jar file was named lucene-1.3-dev1.jar and it should be lucene-1.2.jar. That should be fixed. The problem is the property value in default.properties file, I believe. Other than that I haven't seen any pro

COMMENT REQUESTED: Lucene 1.2 Final Release

2002-06-04 Thread Peter Carlson
Hi, I have not received any feedback on the developer list regarding the stability / status of Lucene 1.2 Final Release. I have posted it up on the release website http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-lucene/release/v1.2/ Can a few other people please validate this so we call it good and l