Re: Datefiltering performance issues

Programmer/Analyst FedEx Services 60 FedEx Pkwy 1st Floor Horiz Collierville, AR 38017 - Original Message - From: Sylvain Puccianti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:35 pm Subject: Re: Datefiltering performance issues > Thanks for the quick answer ! > I've ju

Re: Datefiltering performance issues

In a former life (not with Lucene), I've handled this range problem by indexing the dates in multiple pieces (, MM, MMDD) and then at query time constructed multiple ranges to cover what the user wanted: So, [19990323 20020612] becomes: [19990323 19990331] AND [199904 19991

Re: Datefiltering performance issues

Thanks for the quick answer ! I've just downloaded the 1.2 release jar, and my test gives me the same results. The more threads I've got, the slower Datefiltering gets (performance degradation is almost exponential). I tried to use the RangeQuery, as advised by Scott Ganyo, but it does not work

Re: Datefiltering performance issues

What version of Lucene are you using? There was a patch made in January to address multi-threaded performance of DateFilter. Doug -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: Datefiltering performance issues

If you're basically looking for a query, try using a RangeQuery instead of a Filter. I think a filter is really best used if you are doing multiple queries on a subset of your data that you can create a filter for. Scott P.S. This question really should have been asked on the *users* list, not