Clemens Marschner wrote:
> Doug, do you think the ranking function as stated in the FAQ
> (http://lucene.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/faq/faqmanager.cgi?file=chapter.searc
> h&toc=faq#q31 is still correct after the recent changes?
Yes, this equation is still correct, although it's now incomplete.
The
TED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Lucene Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:31 PM
Subject: document & field boosting
> FY
PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Lucene Developers List
> Subject: document & field boosting
>
>
> FYI, I just added document and field boosti
Doug , you are amazing!!
ciao.
--
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 12:31:49
Doug Cutting wrote:
>FYI, I just added document and field boosting to Lucene. It should be
>in tonight's nightly build.
>
>This lets one, e.g., implement Google-like ranking, where a factor in a
>document's score is determined i
FYI, I just added document and field boosting to Lucene. It should be
in tonight's nightly build.
This lets one, e.g., implement Google-like ranking, where a factor in a
document's score is determined independently from the text of the document.
Longer term, I'd still like to open up document
