(now that I know what's going on) I wasn't getting
any
hits from this search (because the QueryParser was normalizing the
query term be "foobar" when it had been indexed as "FOOBAR")
I know that i could create my own query to search for "FOOBAR", but
it
seems
would not only be limited in its added value, but would indeed likely
be confusing.
Regards,
Terry
- Original Message -
From: "Tatu Saloranta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 2:12
On Sunday 23 February 2003 08:56, Matthew King wrote:
> I'd thought this went into the black hole of feature requests never to
> return. ;)
>
> I also agree that the single quote is probably a bad choice for an
> operator. In my code i'm actually using "#lit()" to make things
> as unambiguous as p
r a
> document
> >>
> >> looking for a term that had been indexed using a Keyword field...
> >>
> >> My application is using the StandardAnalyzer and the QueryParser
> to
> >> search the index, so my query looked something like this:
> >>
>
the QueryParser was normalizing the
query term be "foobar" when it had been indexed as "FOOBAR")
I know that i could create my own query to search for "FOOBAR", but
it
seems reasonable to add a LITERAL operator so that keywords can be
searched usin
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Matthew King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: literal operator?
> Hello Matthew,
>
> Nobody responded to this one.
> Any strong opinions about including this from developers?
> I thought this would be a us
normalizing the
> query term be "foobar" when it had been indexed as "FOOBAR")
>
> I know that i could create my own query to search for "FOOBAR", but
> it
> seems reasonable to add a LITERAL operator so that keywords can be
> searc
(now that I know what's going on) I wasn't getting any
hits from this search (because the QueryParser was normalizing the
query term be "foobar" when it had been indexed as "FOOBAR")
I know that i could create my own query to search for "FOOBAR", but it
se
