t;Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: lucene.apache.org problems again
On Feb 20, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The bitname.com name servers haven't updated. Surnet and Hyperreal
have
done so. Checking the allowed list, I see:
Fixed. The process that does that h
I've forwarded this on to Apache infrastructure. I asked about this
once before and the response was to be patient and let things propagate
- though something is amiss.
Erik
On Feb 20, 2005, at 10:00 AM, John Haxby wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Yes, I'm also experiencing spotty DNS issues
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Yes, I'm also experiencing spotty DNS issues with lucene.apache.org -
I can browse to it through the web, but my e-mail server cannot send
to the new e-mail lists (for svn commits and PMC only right now).
Shouldn't DNS updates be quicker than this? It's been a week since it
Yes, I'm also experiencing spotty DNS issues with lucene.apache.org - I
can browse to it through the web, but my e-mail server cannot send to
the new e-mail lists (for svn commits and PMC only right now).
Shouldn't DNS updates be quicker than this? It's been a week since it
was set up.
Hello All,
I'm not sure what's going on here, but of the four nameservers for
apache.org (ns1.us.bitnames.com, ns1,eu.bitnames.com, ns.hyperreal.org
and ns2.surfnet.nl) only the last two know about lucene.apache.org. If
the two bitnames.com DNS servers haven't spotted the existence of
luce
