[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicholas Paldino updated LUCENENET-281:
---
Attachment: TestQueryParser.TestCJK.patch
As mentioned in the comments, the second
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779338#action_12779338
]
Nicholas Paldino edited comment on LUCENENET-281 at 11/18/09 6:56 AM:
TestCJK on TestQueryParser fails
Key: LUCENENET-281
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-281
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Nicholas Paldino
Priority: Mi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicholas Paldino updated LUCENENET-280:
---
Attachment: TestQueryParser.TestProtectedCtors.patch
This changes the logic in the
TestProtectedCtors test on TestQueryParser fails.
-
Key: LUCENENET-280
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-280
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Nichola
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Garski updated LUCENENET-279:
-
Attachment: LUCENENET-279.patch
I found the root cause and have a patch.
The test han
TestIndexWriter.TestExceptionOnMergeInit hangs
--
Key: LUCENENET-279
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-279
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Michael Garsk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779277#action_12779277
]
Michael Garski commented on LUCENENET-257:
--
This patch fixes a few other tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Aroush closed LUCENENET-277.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Sorry, I already fixed this earlier today.
> TestQueryParser tests al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779275#action_12779275
]
Nicholas Paldino commented on LUCENENET-277:
Not a problem, hopefully there
After applying the patch that I submitted for LUCENENET-277,
most of the tests under TestQueryParser run and pass.
Two notable standouts are TestDateRange and
TestLegacyDateRange.
If you apply the patches from LUCENENET-278, then the tests
sti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779273#action_12779273
]
Michael Garski commented on LUCENENET-277:
--
George already committed a change f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Garski updated LUCENENET-257:
-
Attachment: LUCENENET-257.patch
Got it. The issue was subtle and was a pain to find a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779266#action_12779266
]
Nicholas Paldino commented on LUCENENET-278:
If these patches, as well as th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicholas Paldino updated LUCENENET-278:
---
Attachment: DateField.patch
SupportClass.patch
Added a new nested
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779212#action_12779212
]
Nicholas Paldino commented on LUCENENET-278:
Patch coming soon.
> Instances
Instances of DateField class cannot be created.
---
Key: LUCENENET-278
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-278
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Nicholas Pa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779197#action_12779197
]
Nicholas Paldino commented on LUCENENET-277:
Patch to follow.
> TestQueryPa
TestQueryParser tests all fail due to incorrect constructor.
Key: LUCENENET-277
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-277
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicholas Paldino updated LUCENENET-277:
---
Attachment: TestQueryParser.patch
This creates a default constructor which passes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779191#action_12779191
]
Michael Garski commented on LUCENENET-257:
--
No worries Andrei :)
I believe I'v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779170#action_12779170
]
Nicholas Paldino commented on LUCENENET-266:
+1 as well. It should also be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779166#action_12779166
]
Andrei Iliev commented on LUCENENET-257:
I just asked a question (not proposed a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-249.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Thanks Iliev, I am closing this issue.
DIGY
> Many bugs fix patch
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779150#action_12779150
]
Michael Garski commented on LUCENENET-257:
--
Digy,
The Eclipse IDE has integrat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy reassigned LUCENENET-257:
--
Assignee: Digy
> TestCheckIndex.TestDeletedDocs
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779147#action_12779147
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-257:
Same question as in LUCENENET-260.
Why doesn't fail Lu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779137#action_12779137
]
Iliev Andrei commented on LUCENENET-276:
It is recommended that any class that o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779136#action_12779136
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-260:
Yes I have read that discussion, and I was the one who
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-276.
--
> BoostingTermQuery + TestBoostingTermQuery
> --
>
> Ke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-276.
Resolution: Fixed
Hi Iliev,
I committed your patch without including "BoostingTermQuery.cs".
If you thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779125#action_12779125
]
Iliev Andrei commented on LUCENENET-260:
Are you read discussion on LUCENENET-14
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779122#action_12779122
]
George Aroush commented on LUCENENET-266:
-
I agree. There is little value to do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779114#action_12779114
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-276:
Hi Iliev,
Previous comment is invalid :-(
But withou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Aroush resolved LUCENENET-275.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Delivered. Thanks Mike!
> TestTokenStreamBWComp issue with 2.9.1
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779102#action_12779102
]
Michael Garski commented on LUCENENET-266:
--
+1 as well from me, after 2.9.1 is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779100#action_12779100
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-266:
+1.
But it can wait till all bugs with 2.9.1 are cleare
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-237.
--
Resolution: Incomplete
> TestDateSort failing
>
>
> Key: LUCENENET-237
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779095#action_12779095
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-237:
Later, we can open a new issue.
> TestDateSort failing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy closed LUCENENET-248.
--
Resolution: Incomplete
> Search.Function tests
> -
>
> Key: LUCENENET-24
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779091#action_12779091
]
Michael Garski commented on LUCENENET-260:
--
I agree with Digy - if merely comme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779090#action_12779090
]
Michael Garski commented on LUCENENET-248:
--
Digy,
I'm not working on this as I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779089#action_12779089
]
Michael Garski commented on LUCENENET-237:
--
Digy,
I'm not working on this at t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779084#action_12779084
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-276:
Hi Iliev
I think you need to get the latest code from s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Aroush resolved LUCENENET-272.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed. Thanks Mike!
> TestPhrasePrefixQuery & TestPositionIncr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779073#action_12779073
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-260:
If the difference were due to the sort algorithm, then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779069#action_12779069
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-237:
Hi Michael,
Are you still working on this?
DIGY
> Tes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779070#action_12779070
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-248:
Hi Michael,
Are you still working on this?
DIGY
> Sea
BoostingTermQuery + TestBoostingTermQuery
--
Key: LUCENENET-276
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-276
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Iliev Andrei
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779067#action_12779067
]
George Aroush commented on LUCENENET-272:
-
I'm working on patch.
> TestPhrasePr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iliev Andrei updated LUCENENET-276:
---
Attachment: BoostingTermQuery+Tests.patch
> BoostingTermQuery + TestBoostingTermQuery
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779064#action_12779064
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-260:
BTW, just commenting out the line 282
"SupportCl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779057#action_12779057
]
Iliev Andrei commented on LUCENENET-260:
I guess it is due to the difference in
I guess it is due to the difference in sort algorithm(?). Anyway,
sorting in indexSerial has not to be done because it can (and it was)
changes the order of the fields added to the document.
Andrei.
Digy (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779047#action_12779047
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-260:
The problem with this issue is that although Lucene.Jav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-270.
Resolution: Fixed
Thank Michael,
patch applied.
DIGY
> TestFilteredSearch & TestMultiPhraseQuery
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iliev Andrei updated LUCENENET-260:
---
Description:
Dead lock issues and LUCENENET-143.
Upd: Dead lock has been resolve in LUCEN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iliev Andrei updated LUCENENET-260:
---
Attachment: (was: TestStressIndexing2.patch)
> src\Test\Index\TestStressIndexing2.cs
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Iliev Andrei updated LUCENENET-260:
---
Attachment: TestStressIndexing2.patch
New patch. Dead lock issue resolved in LUCENENET-25
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-271.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks,
committed.
DIGY
> TestMulitSearcher - TestParallelMultiSearcher
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-273.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Michael,
patch applied.
DIGY
> Unnecessary Constructor Removal
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Aroush resolved LUCENENET-269.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Mike! Patch committed.
> TestFieldCacheRangeFilter
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Aroush resolved LUCENENET-268.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Mike! Patch committed.
> TestComplexExplanations
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-255.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Digy
committed.
DIGY
> TestIndexWriter's failing tests
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Aroush resolved LUCENENET-267.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Mike! Patch committed.
> Function.TestOrdValues
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12778984#action_12778984
]
George Aroush commented on LUCENENET-255:
-
Commit away. Thanks DIGY!
> TestInd
66 matches
Mail list logo