I guess it is due to the difference in sort algorithm(?). Anyway,
sorting in indexSerial has not to be done because it can (and it was)
changes the order of the fields added to the document.
Andrei.
Digy (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian
I think (but not sure) you need to send a message to
lucene-net-dev-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org .
It would be nice if information about how to unsubscribe will be added
to the Lucene.Net page (http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/). Who
can do it, George, DIGY?
Gábor Alsecz wrote:
Ho
han we are.
Thanks.
-- George
-Original Message-----
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...@mail.ru]
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 9:20 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-249) Many bugs fix patch
Thanks, Digy
I got log messages from TortoiseSVN. I
code as a clue to find out what has to be fixed in current trunk.
-
Andrei
Digy wrote:
Hi Andrei, You can see the commits and changes made to the code using svn.
If you are using TortoiseSVN just use "Show Log".
DIGY.
-Original Message-----
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...
Hi, Digy
I was (and I am) quite sure it is hard to join current trunk and
proposed fixes. Sorry, but I don't know how to make smaller patches
(there so many changes - alfa code was too buggy)
I think it would be easy if there is a complete list of patches made
from first release of the 2.9.
Hi Folks,
I just finished resolving most of the problems with Lucene.Net 2.9.0. I
started the work a week ago and now I feel it can be published now.
My first intention was to share fixes as soon as I did it. But soon I
found that it is not quite easy. It is required to submit first patch
t
--Original Message-----
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...@mail.ru]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 3:47 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.0 build 001 "Alpha" is now committed
Thanks a lot.
Found so far:
1) search/Spans/PayloadSpans.cs - is not inc
luded in the project Lucene.Net file.
---
Andrei
George Aroush wrote:
Fixed. Renamed "Payload" to "Payloads". Thanks for being the first to try
this out.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...@mail.ru]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 7:
Hi,
Src does not compile out of the box: folder Payloads - does not exist,
what does exists - folder Payload (without ending s)
Please, rename search/payload -> search/payloads
Andrei
George Aroush wrote:
Hi Folks,
If you are watching lucene-net-commitsincubator.apache.org you will
no
Hi,
Src does not compile out of the box:
folder Payloads - does not exist, what does exists - folder Payload
(without ending s)
Please, rename search/payload -> search/payloads
Andrei
George Aroush wrote:
Hi Folks,
If you are watching lucene-net-commitsincubator.apache.org you will
n
Me too.
Benson Margulies wrote:
Is everyone else getting spam from the 'Minimalist List Manager' for each
message here?
Ben Martz ?:
Am I the only one seeing these emails? Anyone know who to contact to get
this fixed?
No. You are not alone.
Cheers,
Ben
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Minimalist Manager
wrote:
* (LUCENENET-194) Bug in
Lucene.Net.Document.Document.cs GetFieldables metho
Ok. Here is the case:
===code===
public static void TestGetFieldables()
{
byte[] bin = new byte[] { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 };
Directory dir = new Lucene.Net.Store.RAMDirectory();
IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(dir, ne
File Descriptor syncing in FSDirectory.cs:
Robert Jordan :
So the real question is: does MS.NET's FileStream.Flush() call
FlushFileBuffers() as well? If yes, the code above can be replaced
with a simple fs.Flush ().
Unfortunately FileStream.Flush() does not call FlushFileBuffers(), see :
- MS
IGY
-Original Message-
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...@mail.ru]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 8:19 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-190) 2.4.0 Performance in
TermInfosReader term caching (New implementation of SimpleLRUCache)
Digy :
I could
Data.Remove(TimeStamps[key]);
TimeStamps.Remove(key);
}
It passed Nunit test. I didn't make any performance test yet.
--
Andrei
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...@mail.ru]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 5:58 PM
copy of LRUCache. If it is faster, we can
use it.
Thanks for suggestion.
Many thanks for a great job of porting Lucene.
Andrei.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...@mail.ru]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 5:58 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject:
]. It should be fast.
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...@mail.ru]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 5:24 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-190) 2.4.0 Performance in
TermInfosReader term caching (New implementation of S
it is huge and
there may be licensing problems.
DIGY.
-Original Message-----
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...@mail.ru]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 4:51 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-190) 2.4.0 Performance in
TermInfosReader ter
it is huge and
there may be licensing problems.
DIGY.
-Original Message-----
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...@mail.ru]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 4:51 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-190) 2.4.0 Performance in
TermInfosReader ter
SimpleLRUCache_LUCENENET_190 uses SortedList collection.
Performance of SortedList (see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms132339.aspx):
1) Add method is an O(n) operation for unsorted data. It is an O(log n) operation if the new element is added at the end of the list.
If insertion caus
Any progress with 2.4.0/2.4.1 so far?
Andrei
Doug Sale ?:
As I mentioned prior (
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-lucene-net-dev/200812.mbox/browser),
I've been working on the 2.4.0 conversion of Lucene to Lucene.NET. I'd like
to discuss making the code publicly available
Current java-version is 2.4. But .Net version is still 2.3.1.
Andrew Psaltis ?:
While looking at the latest MEAP edition of Lucene in Action and trying to
port Listing 10.2 from the Java to .NET, I noticed an inconsistency in the
DecRef and IncRef API of the IndexReader. The java version hav
Andreas Mummenhoff ?:
Hello Digy,
why nobody applies this patches to the current SVN trunk?
People just downloading the trunk and not knowing about jira don't get the
"best" version available? Why?
+1000!
greetings,
Andreas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Digy (JIRA) [mail
24 matches
Mail list logo
