[x] YES, Michael Garski as committer to Lucene.Net
-- George
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:14 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lu
thanks.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Granroth, Neal V.
wrote:
>
> You have to remove the SHARP_ZIP_LIB symbol from the build properties page.
>
> - Neal
>
>
You have to remove the SHARP_ZIP_LIB symbol from the build properties page.
- Neal
e.org
Subject: RE: Search.Regex implementation
Thanks you George,
I've added the license headers copying them from other project's files.
As for your points, yes I ported the bare minimum for my needs; at this time
I just have this essential (minimal) port for Lucene regex-based queries and
sp
Hi Karell,
Topics like
"using a newer version of VS",
"making the code more .NET-like",
or "applying best practices of .NET" etc.
have been discussed many times in the past.
Some example threads are:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-lucene-net-dev/200
mbre 2009 06:08
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Search.Regex implementation
Hi Daniele,
Thanks for the port, I had a look at it and here is my comments:
1) Each source file must have the Apache License header.
2) The code must be submitted through JIRA as an attachment.
3)
Hi Daniele,
Thanks for the port, I had a look at it and here is my comments:
1) Each source file must have the Apache License header.
2) The code must be submitted through JIRA as an attachment.
3) When I compare your port to the Java version, I see some files missing,
did you port only what you
[X] YES, Michael Garski as committer to Lucene.Net
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 4:14 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene
[X] YES, Michael Garski as committer to Lucene.Net
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:13 AM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> I propose Michael Garski as a new Lucene.Net committer.
>
>
>
> Mike has been contributing for Lucene.Net since late 2007 and as of
> November
> 2009 he consistently contr
+1
Olivier Spinelli
-Message d'origine-
De : George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Envoyé : mardi 15 décembre 2009 03:14
À : lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc : lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org
Objet : [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer
Hi Folks,
I propos
[x] YES, Michael Garski as committer to Lucene.Net
am Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2009 um 03:13 schrieben Sie:
GA> Hi Folks,
GA>
GA> I propose Michael Garski as a new Lucene.Net committer.
GA>
GA> Mike has been contributing for Lucene.Net since late 2007 and as of November
GA> 2009 he consist
[X] YES, Michael Garski as committer to Lucene.Net
[x] YES, Michael Garski as committer to Lucene.Net
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:13 PM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> I propose Michael Garski as a new Lucene.Net committer.
>
>
>
> Mike has been contributing for Lucene.Net since late 2007 and as of November
> 2009 he consistently contribu
+1
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:14 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer
Hi Folks,
I propose Michael Gars
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 9:14 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Michael Garski as new Lucene.Net committer
Hi Folks,
I propose Michael Garsk
[X] YES, Michael Garski as committer to Lucene.Net
Narendra Tumkur
>>> "George Aroush" 15/12/2009 1:13 PM >>>
Hi Folks,
I propose Michael Garski as a new Lucene.Net committer.
Mike has been contributing for Lucene.Net since late 2007 and as of November
2009 he consistently contributed for
I've been testing 2.9.1 in our staging environment for the last week and a
half, and have submitted a few minor patches (which have already been
committed) for issues I've found and will continue to do so should I discover
any more.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailt
--Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 11:00 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: port of contrib packages from java
Rob,
I appreciate the input, but I feel that I might have been
mis
ack; I just committed a fix.
>> However, I don't see "Allow unsafe code" set (per your previous email).
>>
>> -- George
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: runenur [mailto:rune...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 6:57 PM
>
My bad. I committed the new project file.
Thanks Michael.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 7:18 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] Resolved: (LUCENENET-313) SharpZipLib dependency
I just tried a build after the commit and the project file needs to be updated
to reflect the deletion of the SharpZopLibAdapter.
Error 1 Source file 'C:\SVN
Projects\Lucene.Net\trunk\C#\src\Lucene.Net\SharpZipLibAdapter.cs' could not be
opened ('Unspecified error ') Lucene.Net
M
in Lucene Java), and a lot of new features and files were added
in 2.9 (code base grew by 30%).
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 2:00 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject:
apter looks simple enough...could it be implemented using the
> Framework's GZipStream? Original Message
>
> From: George Aroush
> To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 12:48:57 AM
> Subject: RE: SharpZipLib dependency
>
> Out of t
.@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 12:53 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: port of contrib packages from java
I agree with George. Catching up to Java (within in a week or so of their
SVN commits) seems like an achievable goal. The work being done on 2.9 is
o
nt.
I'd rather have a .NET port that is 10% slower but can more easily adapt new
features from the parent project than a super-sweet .NET API that people have
to bend over backwards to re-re-implement parent project features.
Do we need to make the internal API more .NET-ish if people aren
er looks simple enough...could it be implemented using the
Framework's GZipStream? Original Message
From: George Aroush
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sun, November 29, 2009 12:48:57 AM
Subject: RE: SharpZipLib dependency
Out of the box, Lucene.Net should not have any
state.
- Nick
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 12:40 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: port of contrib packages from java
I'm not discouraging the use of .NET 3.5, or making Lucene
ene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: The solution file is not configured correctly
>
> I'm sorry, I meant the project file. Also, the output directory is
> incorrect. It is currently set to bin/Debug both in the debug and the
> release configuration.
>
> - Rune
>
>
lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: The solution file is not configured correctly
I'm sorry, I meant the project file. Also, the output directory is
incorrect. It is currently set to bin/Debug both in the debug and the
release configuration.
- Rune
Lucene.Net (think of our VB.NET users) or can use SharpZipLib (think of
license issue).
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 11:24 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: SharpZipLib dependency
Is is related with
k behind Lucene Java), before we commit to be fully
.NET compliant and take full advantage of it.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:09 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subje
List Unsubscribe
I'm sorry, I meant the project file. Also, the output directory is
incorrect. It is currently set to bin/Debug both in the debug and the
release configuration.
- Rune
Is is related with Licensing issues.
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: runenur [mailto:rune...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 10:43 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: SharpZipLib dependency
Hey guys,
I just tried to do a clean compile of the code base, and n
runenur wrote:
Hey guys,
I just tried to do a clean compile of the code base, and notices that
there's a dependency to the SharpZipLib assembly. If this is a
necessary dependency, why is the assembly not included in the svn
repository? It is considered best practice to have all dependencies
chec
t
that I know who's vote would matter or count, but it's something you
suggested for the ports of the contrib projects)?
- Nick
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 11:21 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incu
send email to: lucene-net-dev-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Regards,
Roger.
-Original Message-
From: Mahdi Rahimi [mailto:mhd_...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 25 November 2009 16:56
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Don't send...
Hi
Please explain more
--- On Mon,
Hi
Please explain more
--- On Mon, 11/16/09, Robert Jordan wrote:
From: Robert Jordan
Subject: Re: Don't send...
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 7:47 AM
Mahdi Rahimi wrote:
> In the name of God.
> Hello
> Please don't send emai
in commit-per-commit port
with Lucene Java, trying to make Lucene.Net and / or contrib more .NET'es
isn't realistic.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Eran Sevi [mailto:erans...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 3:12 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Su
rom: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:11 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: port of contrib packages from java
>
>On a somewhat related note, these ports, do they adhere to the
> te
ver to .NET 3.5 ASAP.
- Nick
-Original Message-
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 12:46 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-301) Tests on TestTimeLimitedCollector
fail
Nick,
We no lon
ginal Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:11 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: port of contrib packages from java
On a somewhat related note, these ports, do they adhere to the
tenants ap
, November 23, 2009 9:11 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: port of contrib packages from java
On a somewhat related note, these ports, do they adhere to the
tenants applied to the main trunk, or can they better follow .NET best
practices if one wants to
Nick,
We no longer use the BitArray-backed filters in favor of the OpenBitSet, whose
capacity can be expanded on demand and performs better. The Bits() method on
filters is deprecated in 2.9.
A simple wrapper around BitArray to allow it to grow would probably be enough
to ensure there is a si
, November 23, 2009 8:45 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: port of contrib packages from java
Thanks,
I'm more into the "queries" package.
If no one will beat me to it, I hope I can help and add it myself.
How did you do the port? manually or using some conversion to
Thanks,
I'm more into the "queries" package.
If no one will beat me to it, I hope I can help and add it myself.
How did you do the port? manually or using some conversion tools?
Eran.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Roger Chapman wrote:
> I've done a first pass port of the Spatial Contrib pro
I've done a first pass port of the Spatial Contrib project :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-199
Roger.
-Original Message-
From: Eran Sevi [mailto:erans...@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 November 2009 13:17
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: port of contrib packages f
Also, let me know when you want to do the SVN move.
On Nov 20, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> bump...
>
> Did anyone make the mailing list requests yet?
> On Nov 12, 2009, at 12:17 AM, George Aroush wrote:
>
>> Hi Grant,
>>
>> Yes, the graduation vote has passed on Oct 20. It's a
bump...
Did anyone make the mailing list requests yet?
On Nov 12, 2009, at 12:17 AM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> Yes, the graduation vote has passed on Oct 20. It's a matter for me finding
> the extra time to do the work required for the move. If you can help, by
> all means do so.
>
Hi Everyone,
Just a small nit-picking here.
Patches should be to fix issues, and nothing more. There is no need to bring
in additional comments or code that don't exists in the Java Lucene world
_unless_ if the comment and code is to explain behavior difference between the
two languages, or e
use.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:44 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: TestDateRange and TestLegacyDateRange - Do they pass in
Java, if so, how?
Michael,
Thanks for the response. It's somewhat of a moot point now, as
the
error in the test was somethi
bject: RE: TestDateRange and TestLegacyDateRange - Do they pass in Java,
if so, how?
Great points Nick. I wanted to think about this overnight and take a
fresh look at it in the morning, and here's my take on it.
TestLegacyDateRange tests the now-deprecated way of expressing d
No. Lucene.NET's default behavior should not depend on an external library.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:01 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] Resolved: (LUCENENE
Digy,
Looks like you accidentally dropped the SHARP_ZIP_LIB define from
Lucene.Net.csproj
-DEBUG;TRACE;SHARP_ZIP_LIB
+TRACE;DEBUG
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Digy (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 9:59 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apach
Great points Nick. I wanted to think about this overnight and take a
fresh look at it in the morning, and here's my take on it.
TestLegacyDateRange tests the now-deprecated way of expressing date &
time information in documents. The DateField type goes away in 3.0 in
favor of DateTools
T
My bad :( That's what I get when I start responding to things before drinking
coffee in the morning.
I'll open another issue on the setter and post a patch for it so any overflow
is handled gracefully.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Digy (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednes
I guess it is due to the difference in sort algorithm(?). Anyway,
sorting in indexSerial has not to be done because it can (and it was)
changes the order of the fields added to the document.
Andrei.
Digy (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-260?page=com.atlassian
Hi Everyone,
The trunk is now based on Java Lucene 2.9.1 code base. So if you are
comparing source code with Java Lucene, make sure you are now looking at the
2.9.1 code base.
Thanks.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:arousge...@aroush.net]
Sent: Monday, Novembe
Mahdi Rahimi wrote:
In the name of God.
Hello
Please don't send email about Jira issues for me and about updates.
Have a look at the headers of this mail and send an email
to the address the "List-Unsubscribe" header is pointing to.
Robert
I think (but not sure) you need to send a message to
lucene-net-dev-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org .
It would be nice if information about how to unsubscribe will be added
to the Lucene.Net page (http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/). Who
can do it, George, DIGY?
Gábor Alsecz wrote:
Ho
How can I unsubscribe from Lucene net email list?
- Original Message -
From: "Iliev Andrei (JIRA)"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 3:45 PM
Subject: [jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-259) Bug in
src\Test\Index\TestTermVectorsReader.cs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUC
han we are.
Thanks.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...@mail.ru]
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 9:20 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-249) Many bugs fix patch
Thanks, Digy
I got log messages from TortoiseSVN. I
ssage-
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...@mail.ru]
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 9:20 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-249) Many bugs fix patch
Thanks, Digy
I got log messages from TortoiseSVN. I 've got 52 revision from
2009-11-06
@mail.ru]
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 3:04 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-249) Many bugs fix patch
Hi, Digy
I was (and I am) quite sure it is hard to join current trunk and
proposed fixes. Sorry, but I don't know how to make smalle
Hi Andrei, You can see the commits and changes made to the code using svn.
If you are using TortoiseSVN just use "Show Log".
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: x...@mail.ru [mailto:x...@mail.ru]
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 3:04 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
S
Hi, Digy
I was (and I am) quite sure it is hard to join current trunk and
proposed fixes. Sorry, but I don't know how to make smaller patches
(there so many changes - alfa code was too buggy)
I think it would be easy if there is a complete list of patches made
from first release of the 2.9.
Forgot to add that if you could review and commit if it looks good,
that would be great.
Thanks,
Michael
On Nov 13, 2009, at 5:15 PM, "Michael Garski" inc.com> wrote:
Digy,
The patch in 244 fixes all issues in Store, including this one.
Michael
On Nov 13, 2009, at 5:12 PM, "Digy (JIRA)"
Digy,
The patch in 244 fixes all issues in Store, including this one.
Michael
On Nov 13, 2009, at 5:12 PM, "Digy (JIRA)" wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-246:
Hmmm... as that class is a helper that abstracts the differences b/w the Java
collection and the .NET implementation, I feel the opposite. At a minimum it
might be worth updating the comment for the class to reflect its purpose and
where it is used.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Ge
mp;focusedCommentId=12777052#action_12777052
]
George Aroush commented on LUCENENET-218:
-
Hi Nick,
Can you please re-create this patch as I can't get the code to
compile? For starters, I can't get the class AttributeImplItem to
compile. Ple
I did... I'll try again.
Alon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Hooton [mailto:ghoo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 12:48 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: unsubscribe lucene-net-dev
I think you need to send a message to lucene-net-dev
-uns
I think you need to send a message to lucene-net-dev
-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org to unsubscribe
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Ruatara Paapu wrote:
> unsubscribe lucene-net-dev
>
Hi Grant,
Yes, the graduation vote has passed on Oct 20. It's a matter for me finding
the extra time to do the work required for the move. If you can help, by
all means do so.
Thanks.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, Nov
Nice! Go for it!
Anyone else want to dive in and help out with other failing tests?
Michael
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Robert Jordan
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 3:40 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira
arski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 8:01 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-216) FSDirectory.Sync Fix to
Ensure Flush to Disk
I really like the idea of breaking out platform-specifics to an
interface. In that way use
, November 10, 2009 8:01 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-216) FSDirectory.Sync Fix to
Ensure Flush to Disk
I really like the idea of breaking out platform-specifics to an
interface. In that way users of Mono or any other platform can
implement their
-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 9:41 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-216) FSDirectory.Sync Fix to
Ensure Flush to Disk
I don't have a problem with that.
I'm totally fine with a ReaderWriterLock, and use ReaderWriterLockSlim
quite often in my own custom caches.
Michael
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:35 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: IndexWrite
Hi Nicholas,
Sorry but this is also solved with the previous patch about
SupportClass.ThreadClass (now in trunk).
DIGY
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 8:35 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: IndexWr
rooted out after that point.
However, an abstraction like this would allow Mono to still use this
functionality.
- Nick
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Robert Jordan
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:41 AM
To: luce
...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Robert Jordan
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 8:41 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-216) FSDirectory.Sync Fix to
Ensure Flush to Disk
Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] wrote:
I disagree, since compile time
...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Robert Jordan
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 8:41 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-216) FSDirectory.Sync Fix to
Ensure Flush to Disk
Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] wrote:
> I disagree, since compile t
nick
-Original Message-
From: Sean Carpenter [mailto:stcarpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:27 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-216) FSDirectory.Sync Fix to
Ensure Flush to Disk
I think conditional compilation will b
lto:stcarpen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:27 AM
> To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-216) FSDirectory.Sync Fix to
> Ensure Flush to Disk
>
> I think conditional compilation will be the solution for anything that
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:27 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-216) FSDirectory.Sync Fix to
Ensure Flush to Disk
I think conditional compilation will be the solution for anything that
requires P/Invokes (at least for now
;kernel32")]
>> public static extern int
>> FlushFileBuffers(Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeFileHandle
>> SafeFileHandle);
>>
>> Will this work with Mono?
>>
>> -- George
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sean Carpenter [mailto:stca
]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 7:26 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-216) FSDirectory.Sync Fix to
Ensure Flush to Disk
I've done some work with Lucene.Net on Mono, so keeping it running
there is important to me. As for issues related
-
From: Sean Carpenter [mailto:stcarpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 7:26 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-216) FSDirectory.Sync Fix to
Ensure Flush to Disk
I've done some work with Lucene.Net on Mono, so keeping it r
[.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:43 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.Net.Store Namespace
Michael,
To that end, yes, I want to help out. I've already added two
patches. I
want to make sure that I
need to keep it so.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:00 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org; lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.Net.Store Namespace
Nick -
I can answer so
t
are failing.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:42 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENE
--Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:14 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.Net.Store Namespace
Michael,
I've posted in another thread asking this, but what are some
t-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-218)
Lucene.Net.Util.TestAttributeSource.TestCloneAttributes
Nick,
That is an exceptional idea! Sure you don't want to just dive in and take
it on?
;)
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.
Lucene.Net contributors and committers who
are active.
Thanks.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:30 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org
S
I've done some work with Lucene.Net on Mono, so keeping it running
there is important to me. As for issues related to the future move to
.Net 3.5, Mono has support for 3.5 including LINQ, so that shouldn't
be a concern. The P/Invokes are the biggest concern to me.
Sean Carpenter
On Tue, Nov 10,
BTW, Michael, thanks for the engagement today, it is much appreciated,
given
I'm an upstart =)
- Nick
-Original Message-
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:00 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org;
ow where I have dedicated time to spend helping out, but the
more the merrier :)
Cheers,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Mon 11/9/2009 10:13 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.Net.Store Na
, November 10, 2009 1:01 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-218)
Lucene.Net.Util.TestAttributeSource.TestCloneAttributes
Nick,
That is an exceptional idea! Sure you don't want to just dive in and take
it on?
;)
Michael
-Original Me
l Message-
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com]
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 9:37 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.Net.Store Namespace
Nick,
While alteration of internal implementations will certainly be openly
embraced, diverging too far from the
Nick,
That is an exceptional idea! Sure you don't want to just dive in and take it
on?
;)
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Mon 11/9/2009 9:57 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE:
1 - 100 of 933 matches
Mail list logo
