Re: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-10-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Thanks, Aaron. By the way, to all others reading this: please do not reply to me privately. It does nothing to help the community and in fact just reinforces in my mind that the project is not sustainable at the ASF because people aren't willing to publicly support it. -Grant On Oct 29, 2010

Re: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-10-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Oct 29, 2010, at 11:19 PM, George Aroush wrote: > Hi Grant and all, > > I will get engaged with the project again. The way I see it, by the end of > the year, we must: > > 1) Clean up the website, and / or > 2) Create an official release off the current trunk, and > 3) Sometimes next year,

Re: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-10-30 Thread Johannes Roith
Hello, everyone! I'm interested in helping to keep Lucene.net alive and well; Most of my time available for open source development is required for another project, so can't make commitments on contributing code (like helping with porting, etc.). I could fix bugs now and then, and help with testi

RE: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-10-30 Thread George Aroush
Hi Grant, I'm perfectly fine going back to incubation, that will help us to re-validate this project and hopefully bring in some new blood. If we do so, beside the current committers, who have had experience with Lucene.Net and the Apache way, who else do we bring in as new initial committers? W

Re: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-10-30 Thread Arne Claassen
Grant, I've been a user of lucene.net for years and would find its loss a great setback to the community. I've spelunked through the code base a bit here and there to track down issues, but have not been comfortable enough to contribute. As a user i've been very happy with lucene.net to t

Re: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-10-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Oct 30, 2010, at 8:52 AM, George Aroush wrote: > Hi Grant, > > I'm perfectly fine going back to incubation, that will help us to > re-validate this project and hopefully bring in some new blood. If we do > so, beside the current committers, who have had experience with Lucene.Net > and the A

Re: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-10-30 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Oct 30, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Simone Chiaretta wrote: > > Personally I don't care if Lucene.net is part of the ASF, in the incubator > or hosted on CodePlex as standalone project, as long as there are releases, > and some committers are working on it. > Maybe Lucene.net could follow the same step

Re: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-10-30 Thread Alex
I'd be interested in providing some new blood for the commits. I'm relatively new to Lucene, but a long time .NET developer. Alex

Re: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-10-30 Thread Dmitri Volsky
Hi, You can count me in. I will be glad to help keep Lucene .Net community alive as well as contribute to development. Dima

RE: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-10-30 Thread Digy
Hi Grant, George and all Lucene.Net community, As a Lucene.Net committer, I didn't quit the project, but stopped deliberately answering the questions and making commits to show no other committers were willing to keep the project alive.(like Apache Board Report. The only response from commiters wa

[jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-373) MultiThreading failed in IndexWritter

2010-10-30 Thread Digy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926662#action_12926662 ] Digy commented on LUCENENET-373: Related with "Lucene.NET Community Status" ( http://ma

[jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-373) MultiThreading failed in IndexWritter

2010-10-30 Thread Alex Thompson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926677#action_12926677 ] Alex Thompson commented on LUCENENET-373: - Have you tried changing the default w